I came across the following suggested edit in the review. It looks like a radical change at first glance.
https://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/1615323
I did't understand the full context of the edit from within the review queue. So, I visited the question to understand the reason behind the edit.
It looks like the OP has left the code in the comment instead of actually editing the question. A user took OP's code in the comment and added it to the question to make it more meaningful. Initially, this whole edit seemed out of context until I visited the question. However, three others users rejected the suggested edit because they thought that the change was radical.
I have enough reputation to actually improve the edit but I don't know anything about actionscript to provide a meaningful edit. To be frank, I didn't expect it to get rejected. I thought that others might realize the intention behind the edit and will approve it. Since the edit was rejected, I visited the question to add the code myself but someone else has already fixed it. It has been taken care.
My question:
What is the recommended approach in these type of situations where not visiting the post might give a contradicting impression to reviewers about the suggested edit?