Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Since SQL Server "Denali" is not likely to be called SQL Server 2011, I'm a little nervous that when the true name is released the questions tagged will get lost in the shuffle. I've tried to casually encourage use of a more generic tag but in almost all cases they end up getting re-tagged back to the former by other users. What I'd like to propose is the tag for now, which - along with and - will later become a synonym for, most likely, .

For more background on this request, please see SQL Server 2011 vs. SQL Server Denali

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, rene, Robert Cartaino Aug 20 '14 at 13:40

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, rene, Robert Cartaino
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Sounds like we just need to synonymize sql-server-2011, sql-server-denali, and denali. They should all refer to the same tag, sql-server-denali. – Cody Gray Jul 29 '11 at 0:13
Well that's the thing - it won't be called "SQL Server Denali", it will be called SQL Server 2012 most likely. We didn't keep "SQL Server Yukon" for SQL Server 2005, or "SQL Server Katmai" for 2008, or "SQL Server Killimanjaro" for 2008 R2. Why would we keep "SQL Server Denali" in the long term? – Aaron Bertrand Jul 29 '11 at 2:12
Fine, then don't keep it. The problem is that we don't know what the official name will be yet, so the best option we have is Denali. When we do have the official name, we'll create another synonym and make [sql-server-20xx] the official tag. We do this all the time for version-specific tags. I don't see why this situation should be any different. The tag synonymizer works really well. – Cody Gray Jul 29 '11 at 4:02
Sorry, I think we're on the same page, I just took your comments as in the long term we should keep SQL-server-denali as the "parent" tag if you will. I have no issues with using that tag in the meantime but I think it should be merely an alias once the official name is known. I apologize for not having extensive knowledge into how the synonymizer works, I just see a lot of tag abuse/misuse out there today. – Aaron Bertrand Jul 29 '11 at 4:15