Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I suggested to the author of a question on SO that he/she should clarify the question. I now see a suggested edit by a different user. The edit itself however seems to suggest to me that they are collaborating on a project. Can I simply assume this and accept the suggestion, or should I reject it and ask the author to post it?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I have wondered the same thing in the past. The consensus that I've heard on edits is: if it improves the question, accept it.

In this case, the original post was nothing but a block of code; the edit added explanation and context that seemed relevant. The original author's desire for an answer is only a part of the formula for judging the usefulness and appropriateness of a Stack Overflow question. The question's future and the site as a whole should also be considered. It is always better to have a solid, open question than a crappy, closed-then-deleted question. In that light, and given that the original author didn't see fit to put enough effort into the question to make it good, such an edit is a net positive.

The edit already had one accept vote just now. I hit the "Improve" button on the suggested edit and cleaned it up a little. The author can always come back and make further edits, or even roll back to the initial not-so-good version (and probably end up with no answers and a closure). Unless and until that happens, we have gone from something useless to something potentially useful.

share|improve this answer
An edit should improve the question without altering the question's meaning. – IAbstract Aug 5 '11 at 20:13
@IAbstract: The question as originally posted had no meaning -- it was simply a block of code. The edit added context and explanation, transforming a useless post into a potentially good SO question. – Josh Caswell Aug 5 '11 at 20:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .