Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I think the pending edit and closed as "Possible Duplicate" should not exist in the same question. The reason is following case:

  1. Someone start a "Possible Duplicates" close voting in a question. According to the Stack Overflow's rule, this is equal to suggest edit the question; we can call it "Pending Version A."
  2. Another one edits the question, and a new pending version will be appeared. We can call it "Pending Version B."
  3. Then the close voting and "Pending Version A" are approved, and the question will be added a description, like this:

    Possible Duplicate:
    Who is the Community user?

  4. The last, "Pending Version B" is approved, and "Version A" is replaced by "Version B"; the "Possible Duplicates" info disappear, and the closing as "Possible Duplicates" is invalid.
How does Stack Overflow deal with this situation?

share|improve this question
There's no suggested edit involved here. The Community user has full editing privileges. No one has to approve it, and it's not "pending". – Cody Gray Aug 8 '11 at 10:27
@Cody Gray I think you didn't understand my case. The case is nothing to do with Community user. I mean the users whose rep is 2000- to edit the question that is closing as "Possible Duplicate". – Roy1 Aug 9 '11 at 1:15

On the questions closed as a duplicate which I've encountered -- lacking the 'Possible Duplicates' info -- I simply:

  1. Go into the revision history.
  2. Grab the source for the duplicate block.
  3. Add it back to the revised version of the question.

There is a possible fourth step where I would consider voting to re-open if the edits specifically differentiate this question from its possible duplicates. However, I have yet to encounter a situation where I wanted to re-open a question which was closed as a duplicate.

share|improve this answer
This is my proposal too. – Roy1 Aug 8 '11 at 6:02
But the proposal isn't the best one, because the duplicate block also needs edit. – Roy1 Aug 8 '11 at 6:10
The back end could also force the last close voter to clear the suggested edit queue before casting the vote. However, I think perhaps a better solution would be to place the 'Possible Duplicates' block within a field which is not user editable. I'm tired of watching newbies delete this info because their 'well-formed question' was closed. – M. Tibbits Aug 8 '11 at 6:11
Perhaps then only 20K / trusted users can edit the 'Possible Duplicate' (while the rest of us can continue flagging the question as a duplicate of other questions which would be auto-appended to the 'Possible Duplicate' section. – M. Tibbits Aug 8 '11 at 6:12
The users who have the privilege to close a question can be given the privilege to edit the 'Possible Duplicate'. – Roy1 Aug 8 '11 at 6:15

To deal with the issue, I think the best way is the following:

  1. Separate the 'Possible Duplicates' info from the question.
  2. Allow the users who have closing privilege to edit the 'Possible Duplicates' info.
  3. Set 'Possible Duplicates' info edit mode as suggest edit, and the 10k users can approve it.
share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .