Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When choosing a message template for a moderator message, we are given several default choices, such as excessive promotion, abusive activity, etc. For cases which don't fit this bill, we have a "something else..." option.

For some reason, when suspending a user under this template, their profile will show "This account is temporarily suspended to cool down", instead of showing no reason, which would make more sense.

This goes against the purpose of including a reason in the suspension banner, which is to reduce speculation and discussion in the community of "oh gosh, why was user-x suspended??". When the "something else..." template is chosen, the reason should be left empty (as the behavior used to be) or there should be a wide range of alternative choices. Otherwise, you end up with users who were suspended for being under 13 (which is a TOS violation) but their profile says they need to cool down for 3 years.

share|improve this question
I would be in favor of "for rule violations." It doesn't have to be more specific than that. – Robert Harvey Aug 9 '11 at 2:28
@RobertHarvey would "For TOS violations" perhaps be more specific and correct in this case? I think generally speaking, there will always be edge cases, so we should have an option to just not specify a reason. – nhinkle Aug 9 '11 at 2:36
Not stating a reason would defeat the whole purpose. See here:… – Robert Harvey Aug 9 '11 at 2:39
@RobertHarvey but stating the wrong reason is counterproductive to the purpose. – nhinkle Aug 9 '11 at 2:51
"For rule violations" almost certainly covers any reason you might want to suspend someone for "something else;" it's specific enough to avoid the Streisand Effect, but vague enough to preserve the suspended user's privacy. – Robert Harvey Aug 9 '11 at 2:53
Fair enough @RobertHarvey. As I mentioned in the edit to my question, it would be good to have some more options. That would cover the situation though. – nhinkle Aug 9 '11 at 3:05
up vote 5 down vote accepted

No -- the entire purpose of this is to avoid having moderators enter something there, something potentially problematic.

We can change it to something other than "to cool down" but manual entry is a non-starter.

edit: I changed it to

for rule violations

which, I am not entirely convinced is any better or more meaningful than "too cool down", but... be careful what you ask for, I guess. :p

share|improve this answer
I edited my question to clarify - I'm not saying we should necessarily have manual entry, I'm saying we should have something other than "to cool down", because "to cool down" is often not the reason. – nhinkle Aug 9 '11 at 2:51
Seems more truthful at least. Thanks for the update. – nhinkle Aug 9 '11 at 5:40
Animuson said on chat that mods can now enter custom reasons. – bjb568 Aug 11 '14 at 0:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .