What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

Meta sites across the SE network — just meta sites, not regular ones — should start awarding a badge for any post that meets both of the following criteria:

  • earns fifteen or more upvotes
  • earns fifteen or more downvotes

These criteria indicate problematic posts on normal SE sites, where votes are cast based on post quality. On Meta sites, though, votes indicate level of agreement, and such posts are generally suggestions that people are conflicted on. In practice, they tend to lead to good, insightful explanations of how the sites work or why certain changes should/shouldn't be made. To back this up, I ran a SEDE query1 to find questions that meet the criteria on SO and on MSO.

Open issues: I found that setting the criteria at five upvotes/five downvotes let too many poor posts through, but 15/15 might be too restrictive; we'll have to do some tweaking on the exact numbers to use. I'm also not sure whether we should limit this to questions or make it available for answers as well.

Obligatory suggestions for name and grade: "Controversial"2 or "Insightful"; silver.

EDIT to reply to comments/answers:

The "false positives" problem that Cody mentioned is a real one. I attempted to address it by raising the criteria to 15 votes each way instead of five, but there certainly could be better metrics... a minimum of one massively upvoted answer, perhaps? I'm confident that we can find something with a decent signal-to-noise ratio with some trial and error.

The name of the badge definitely needs work. As dmckee said, we shouldn't be giving the impression that we're actively encouraging controversy. "Controversial" is merely an objective description for posts that correlate with (if not cause) insightfulness, and insightfulness is the real goal.

With that in mind, "Insightful" might be the superior name. More likely, there's some third, even better term out there that I haven't thought of yet. Lance described target posts as thought-provoking, so how about "Provocative" or "Intriguing"?

1: I was unable to generate the query myself; it was contributed by Andriy M.

2: While asking this question, I discovered that there have been two requests for controversy badges before. One was for Area 51 and the other was for regular sites.

share|improve this question
    
+1 I was thinking about this just a couple hours ago. You read my mind! –  FishBasketGordo Aug 9 '11 at 19:46
1  
Maybe also add something which says "at most X times as much upvotes as downvotes (and vice versa)", to avoid including things like 77:7 (or 102:22). X = 3 or 5 could be a good guess. –  Paŭlo Ebermann Aug 9 '11 at 20:13
    
Perhaps a moderator tag, auto-added to the controversial questions as well -- orange in color? –  M. Tibbits Aug 9 '11 at 20:20
    
As for now, there are 10 posts that qualify: Most controversial posts on the site. –  NGLN Aug 9 '11 at 20:51
    
And 5 candidates... ;) –  NGLN Aug 9 '11 at 20:57
    
This is definitely the best badge idea yet :) –  Lance Roberts Aug 9 '11 at 22:21
1  
awesome badge there cacha ... meta.stackexchange.com/questions/37493/… ... wait a moment ... did I just delete that –  waffles Aug 10 '11 at 1:48
    
This is the best badge-request post that I've ever seen, but I'm still not sure if it's a good idea. There are too many cases where questions are controversial, but still not any good. –  Cody Gray Aug 10 '11 at 4:46
    
@waffles, that's cold, considering what the highest-scoring answer is. Er, was. –  Pops Aug 10 '11 at 20:20
    
I downvoted this to get you closer to getting the badge once it's approved. –  JNK Aug 12 '11 at 14:54
    
@PopularDemand what's happening with this?? –  user223277 Jul 17 '13 at 15:55
1  
@Yve as far as I can tell, nothing. Unfortunately, I have no more information than you do. –  Pops Jul 17 '13 at 18:56

2 Answers 2

While dealing with controversy is an important task for the metas, I'm not sure that we are served by encouraging people to try to generate controversy.

share|improve this answer
7  
Maybe I'm underestimating things, but I think it's pretty hard to create controversy as defined by @Popular. I expect most frivolous attempts to do so will encounter a "meh" vote - either a lot of downvotes, or simply no voting activity at all –  Pëkka Aug 9 '11 at 22:14

Controversy, as long as it stays friendly is always good, because it makes people think about what's being said. So a post that generates controversy is one that has really made people think about the issue. Certainly, one of the things I like about Stack Overflow and Meta is that I see a lot that makes me think.

Making people think should be rewarded.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .