Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

In wiki questions, which are usually subjective, I want to see the most popular answer bubble to the top. But in questions that are not subjective or only have a few posts, I sort by oldest first (to see how the answers developed). On top of this, I would also like to disable the "accepted answer on top" feature, since that ruins my flow of reading the development of an answer.

share|improve this question

Put me down as against it. Allowing this would encourage the idea that wiki means it is OK to treat SO/SF/SU as a discussion forum.

Accepted questions get special treatment to encourage the idea that these sites are for helping people to solve problems. Which is as it should be.

share|improve this answer
    
Then what is the point of wiki, if not to build a reference section of sorts. – Thomas Owens Jul 27 '09 at 22:44
2  
Building a reference section is all well and good, but all questions are or should be that way. There are more than a few users who seem to believe that wiki questions are fundamentally different, and have the attitude "If I make it wiki it doesn't have to be on topic." I don't want to encourage that idea. – dmckee Jul 27 '09 at 22:55
    
Reference Section != Discussion Section. Discussion topics have no value, period. Aka, how do I decide which headphones to buy. – Ian Elliott Jul 27 '09 at 23:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .