What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

Smartlinks are perhaps the greatest thing since sliced bread--IOW a pretty good invention that saves some time and makes life a little tastier--but they are a pain to use. They need to go on their own line (a particular problem when combined with overly aggressive flood control), and failing to include the http:// prefix causes them to not work. Since I have not yet encountered an FTP XKCD comic, this all seems a bit unnecessary.

Is there any reason for these "features," and if not can they be fixed?

share|improve this question
2  
I wish people would stop complaining that they should be able to write novels in chat without anybody having a chance to interrupt. It's a chat, for goodness' sake, not a blog engine. –  balpha Aug 15 '11 at 14:16
1  
This is not a question about flood control. That's addressed elsewhere. –  Ari B. Friedman Aug 15 '11 at 14:19
    
The reason you give for wanting to onebox a link that doesn't appear as its own message (how would that even look?) is that it's "a problem when combined with overly aggressive flood control". –  balpha Aug 15 '11 at 14:21
    
A reason not the reason. Clarified in the question. –  Ari B. Friedman Aug 15 '11 at 14:24
    
@balpha "How would that even look" is an interesting question. Perhaps if not at the beginning or end of a message it could have the link replaced with the page's title, and if at the beginning or end it could get onebox'd as though the user had newlined it. –  Ari B. Friedman Aug 15 '11 at 14:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .