Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

These three tags:

appear to be ambiguous (in application to a wide variety of unrelated topics) and really serve as metaphors for:

  • Could you provide me with more ?
  • How about some ?

Could they be blacklisted, or at least removed? Thoughts?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, rene, Robert Cartaino Aug 20 '14 at 13:40

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, rene, Robert Cartaino
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Kill. Kill. Kill. Destroy. Destroy. Destroy. None of them add any real value. By eliminating easy-to-use-and-apply-to-anything tags like this you force the OP to think more carefully about the careful tagging of their question.

To me, none of them when used in that form add any more value than having a tag saying .

share|improve this answer
Excellent point about the side benefits of eliminating such inviting and easy-to-use tags. – Cody Gray Aug 20 '11 at 3:35
Perhaps just as surprising as the 22 following advice? – M. Tibbits Aug 20 '11 at 3:50
@Cody & slugster, should I add tool-advice x 28 application-advice x 24 library-advice x 7 too? – M. Tibbits Aug 20 '11 at 3:55
@M.Tibbits: Looks like you already solved the tooladvice and applicationadvice problem. I agree those tags aren't particularly informative... Perhaps library-advice should be a synonym for libraries (which does at least convey some information about the problem). – Cody Gray Aug 20 '11 at 3:57

I think that is useless, when it's used in questions such as the following ones:

The tag seems used when the OP is asking information (which question is not asking information?) or when the topic of the question is information displayed from some code. It is a too generic tag that doesn't seem to be useful.
Are there any expert of information that are following the tag? Are there any users that filters the questions basing on that tag?
The most important question is then: How useful is a tag if it applies to the majority of the questions asked on a SE site?

share|improve this answer
Surprisingly, there are 7 people who follow the information tag. I'm not sure why, as I agree it's useless. – Cody Gray Aug 20 '11 at 3:36

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .