What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 129 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Adding support for math notation

I believe the MathJax should also work in Stack Overflow, not only in stats, math... SE sites. It is suitable in many questions and answers. It would make such posts much more readable.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Kevin Montrose Sep 15 '11 at 18:44

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
@Kevin Montrose Is it not OK to re-request a feature-request that is over 2 years old? What is the proper technique for trying to persuade you guys to change your mind on something? –  Michael McGowan Sep 15 '11 at 20:54
1  
@Michael, thank you for your effort. In these situations, not very rare unfortunatelly, the SO/SE community seems pretty rigid. Stop discussion. Duplicate, not a real question, not constructive. Dot. –  Tomas Sep 15 '11 at 21:03
    
@Michael - the same objection still applies. MathJax is really really heavy (and getting heavier, this has come up on Math.SE), and not commonly needed enough to include. I figured closing as duplicate was better than copy/pasting Jeff's old answer. –  Kevin Montrose Sep 15 '11 at 21:09
1  
@Kevin There has been some discussion here by Tomas that perhaps it could somehow be done on demand. I don't know whether that is feasible, but that point did not seem to be addressed in the referenced post. However, I don't think adding that in a 2-year old "status-declined" post is likely to advance the discussion at all (whereas it might have a fighting chance in a fresh question). –  Michael McGowan Sep 15 '11 at 21:15
    
One answer in this question would also be eligible for MathJax: stackoverflow.com/questions/7843048/… –  Tomas Oct 21 '11 at 13:12

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Speaking as someone who is both a mathematician and a software developer, I agree that this would be beneficial. However, Jeff Atwood disagrees that the benefit is worth the heavy burden this markup places upon the system. While I do think it would be nice, I'm not in a position to know what the burden would be relative to the benefit.

share|improve this answer
    
thanks for response... I understand that mathjax could be very demanding having much expressions on the page, but, is mathjax really so demanding when you use it only here and there? –  Tomas Sep 15 '11 at 14:43
    
Tomas, I would not think it is so demanding and I struggle to see what the big deal is, but you would have to take that up with Jeff. –  Michael McGowan Sep 15 '11 at 14:59
1  
@Tomas, the thing is, MathJax is a javascript library, you can't choose which pages it gets loaded on, so if you want it to be able to work everywhere, it has to get loaded everywhere. Given that the dev team are completely obsessed with shaving off the tiniest millisecond on every page served, statistically speaking there's near-zero justification for including MathJax support. We're talking 2000000+ questions (and rising). What percentage of those require MathJax? –  Benjol Sep 15 '11 at 17:56
1  
@Benjol, the mathjax library could be loaded only for questions where it is used in. And loading it for editing wouldn't be such a problem I think, moreover you cound use on-demand loading then (either implicit or explicit - e.g. by user switching it on). –  Tomas Sep 15 '11 at 18:10
    
@Tomas, when do you decide (and how) that it is 'used'? Auto-detecting and user switching it on both feel a bit kludgy to me, especially, as I said, given the very low percentage of questions where it applies... –  Benjol Sep 15 '11 at 20:03
    
@Benjol, when do you decide (and how) that it is 'used'? I think it is quite simple to see if MathJax is used in particular question or not. As for the editting, script autoload upon writing first MathJax sequence would be appropriate I think (you normally wait for MathJax expressions to render anyway). –  Tomas Sep 15 '11 at 20:43

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .