Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
“Ban myself” button in user profiles

Is it possible to obtain a suspension on one's own user account by request?

If so, will the message on my profile make it clear that the suspension was requested, or will it look like I got in trouble?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Yannis, jonsca, Toon Krijthe, Al E., animuson Oct 19 '12 at 1:48

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

I did actually request this facility myself when I found myself spending far too much time on here to the detriment of something else. Jeff altered my openid such that it was impossible for me to log in. – Martin Smith Sep 18 '11 at 16:41
Nice try, some Stacker's wife/husband – Jin Sep 18 '11 at 17:06
I'd be sorry to see you go, Tomalak. – Michael Petrotta Sep 18 '11 at 19:00
@Michael: Thanks. Frankly, I think you're one of only a small few. In general, I feel a great sense of unappreciation for regulars, perhaps only because the majority of those who gain the most from our work are fleeting drive-bys who don't realise how much we do for those of their ilk. I'm not here for that and usually I wouldn't care, but it does build up over time. [And, yes, as one who strongly opposes "thanks" in posts that may seem hypocritical, but "thanks" in posts hardly contribute to any meaningful sense of appreciation. Which is actually one of my issues with them.] – Lightness Races in Orbit Sep 18 '11 at 22:17
Why not take a couple of weeks off, re-charge your batteries, then decide if you want to carry on participating. No point in making an overly hasty decision when you're at a low ebb. – Kev Sep 19 '11 at 0:09
@Kev: That's what I'm asking about. – Lightness Races in Orbit Sep 19 '11 at 9:25
Does it really need suspension? Just don't use the site – Kev Sep 19 '11 at 9:46
@Kev: If only it were that easy! – Lightness Races in Orbit Sep 19 '11 at 10:07
Not sure why SE should be wasting resources because of an individuals lack of self control. – chown Mar 21 '12 at 1:24
@chown: that's our core audience you're talking about! – Shog9 Mar 21 '12 at 4:29
up vote 8 down vote accepted

I know of one case where this was done, so I think most moderators would agree to your request and suspend you, if you wish so. Suspensions are per-site, if you need a network-wide ban an SE employee would be needed.

The suspension notices on the user profile are pre-formulated and selected based on the reason for the suspension. Moderators cannot enter a custom message to be displayed publicly on a user's profile.

share|improve this answer
IIRC "to cool off" is the default suspension note. I suppose that's appropriate enough. – hammar Sep 18 '11 at 20:45
@hammar: I would not want people to think that it had been forced on me. Maybe my ego's too big, but, well, sue me. – Lightness Races in Orbit Sep 18 '11 at 22:16
(There are also issues with the fact that the suspension message would be cached in e.g. the wayback machine for all eternity. Talk about an employment hindrance.) – Lightness Races in Orbit Mar 21 '12 at 0:49
@Lightness: the publicly-displayed suspension messages are intentionally vague for this very reason. Of course, anything you put in your bio text can also be scraped and archived, and we don't usually step in to sanitize that... FYI. – Shog9 Mar 21 '12 at 1:09
Seems like adding something in your profile saying that you've asked to have your account suspended to enable you to focus on something else would be wise. This would also reduce poking through twitter or email or blog comments if people know how to reach you that way, as well as clarifying the "to cool off" message added as a result of the suspension. – Kate Gregory Mar 21 '12 at 14:23

Given that this is the more constructive version of your other request, here are my thoughts.

Answering the title directly:

Can an account be self-suspended?

An account can't technically be "self-suspended", in that you don't have the ability to give yourself a suspension. Suspensions are handed out by diamonds. So in the most literal sense, no, you cannot.

Answering the question body directly:

Is it possible to obtain a suspension on one's own user account by request?

Yes, this is completely possible. As Fabian points out, this requires various degrees of diamond and/or SE dev work depending on the scope of the suspension.

However, I firmly disagree with Fabian on the following statement (and this is just me, as a moderator on Stack Overflow, I'm not speaking for the other moderators on Stack Overflow or on the other Stack Exchange sites):

so I think most moderators would agree to your request and suspend you, if you wish so.

Personally, I would not honor this request.

This is something we're simply not qualified for.

This isn't to be confused with a lack of empathy for a situation where one would want this, but there's too much liability (in as much as we can have given what we do, really) attached to an action such as this.

If you feel that there's a compulsion to be on or a reason you feel you can't be away from Stack Overflow under your own will, then that's a behavioral issue, and that's an issue for you to deal with. We are not behavioral therapists.

To even begin to approach that role would be extremely negligent on our part and could possibly do you more harm than good.

Finally, there is the canonical reference on suspensions originally written by Jeff:

Nowhere in the post does it indicate that a suspension is to be used for users who are constructive to the community. From that post (emphasis mine):

Our general strategy is to discourage specific problem behaviors, not individual users. But sometimes you just can’t seem to reach people, and it becomes necessary to place accounts in timed suspension.

Quite simply, you aren't exhibiting problem behavior (and I don't encourage you to do so for your purpose) and as a result, you don't fulfill the requirements for suspension.

share|improve this answer
I don't see how it would be negligent. It is common for gambling sites to have a self bar facility. Do you regard that as negligence too? What do you think is the worst that's going to happen from granting these requests? – Martin Smith Mar 21 '12 at 13:02
@MartinSmith It is negligent on the part of the moderator (in this case me) to fulfill this request when it is not within the scope of their duties. Also, I've referenced the original blog entry from Jeff on this subject, which should show that issuing suspensions are for problem behavior. – casperOne Mar 21 '12 at 13:21
Actually I thought this was a feature request to expand that. I see now it isn't and is just asking about current policy. – Martin Smith Mar 21 '12 at 13:25

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .