Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I was just perusing the 'review' page for first answers, and I found this answer, which I thought I could fix up. Here is what I wanted to change it to:

You can't redirect to fix this because the SSL check happens before the HTTP connection 
has been fully made.

So, you have 3 options:

1. The best option is to get a cert that supports www and non-www. [RapidSSL](https://www.thesslstore.com/rapidssl/rapidssl-certificates.aspx) does this nicely, and most likely there are other vendors offering this as well.

1.  You can also get a wildcard cert that will let you do ANYTHING.mydomain.com. This can be more expensive, but most SSL Certificate vendors offer this, including [GoDaddy](http://help.godaddy.com/article/567).

1. The last choice is to purchase two separate certs, one for www and one for non-www. 

The three main things I was trying to do with this edit were:

  • fix formatting
  • un-shorten links so people know where they are going (we don't need to conserve characters here), and inline the links
  • make the answer less like an advertisment for a specific SSL certificate vendor.

I don't think that any of these things are/should be against the ToS.

So, how can I accomplish these goals (of making the answer more helpful to the community)?

share|improve this question
    
Interestingly enough, this post (which contained the content from the prohibited post) was not blocked, perhaps because the content was in a code block. – pkaeding Sep 21 '11 at 2:33
    
Perhaps someone was spamming for GoDaddy or TheSSLStore and now links to those sites are no longer allowed? – Matthew Read Sep 21 '11 at 2:48
    
@kiamlaluno yes, I was unable to submit my edit. – pkaeding Sep 21 '11 at 2:50
    
@MatthewRead Good point. Perhaps that is why the links were shortened in the first place... I wonder what kind of link would be appropriate here, to not necessarily favor one vendor over another. I looked for wikipedia articles, but none seemed to really be appropriate for this. I would be afraid that a google search results page listing many vendors offering these services would be seen as a LMGTFY type of thing (which seems to be frowned upon). – pkaeding Sep 21 '11 at 2:53
1  
www.thesslstore.com is blocked on StackOverflow (but not on meta) for whatever reason; that's why you couldn't submit your edit. – NullUserException อ_อ Sep 21 '11 at 2:56
    
PS: Please don't inline your links. Use the [link text][1] and [1]: http://example.org syntax instead. – NullUserException อ_อ Sep 21 '11 at 3:03
5  
@NullUserExceptionஇ_இ, both link formats are absolutely supported. Is there a reason you are telling users not to use a supported format? – Rebecca Chernoff Sep 21 '11 at 3:08
    
@RebeccaChernoff It renders the question hard to read, especially with longer links (when in edit mode). I remember seeing a post somewhere by Jeff or Sam (Saffron) recommending the usage of the "reference" syntax. I personally prefer it for clarity. I only use the other format on comments. – NullUserException อ_อ Sep 21 '11 at 3:12
    
Another thing is the inline syntax breaks if the link has a right parens. – NullUserException อ_อ Sep 21 '11 at 3:17
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Focusing on your edit, you mention that you want to make the answer less like an advertisement for a specific vendor. However, it looks like you solved that by adding a link to another vendor. I disagree that this makes the answer less an advertisement. Now you're just advertising 2 companies instead of 1. What if these links go bad? Teach the user what they need to know without advertising.

share|improve this answer
    
That is a good point, and one I was having trouble with myself (see my comment to Matthew Read above). – pkaeding Sep 21 '11 at 2:58
    
I disagree. Sometimes links to a commercial product are necessary. That doesn't mean they are advertisements. – NullUserException อ_อ Sep 21 '11 at 2:58
    
@pkaeding Why do you need to link to a vendor or a google search? Can't people do that themselves? Provide content, make it something useful for people to read and learn. – Rebecca Chernoff Sep 21 '11 at 2:59
1  
@NullUserExceptionஇ_இ, you're right, but in this case I don't think it's absolutely necessary to include the link. – Rebecca Chernoff Sep 21 '11 at 3:00
    
Why link to documentation? Can't people find that themselves? Providing links makes it easier for people to find additional content that your answer can't feasibly cover. It's a matter of convenience. – NullUserException อ_อ Sep 21 '11 at 3:02
    
@NullUserExceptionஇ_இ, in this case, as you stated in your since-deleted answer, that's not going to work, so yeah, that answer is just fine without the link. – Rebecca Chernoff Sep 21 '11 at 3:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .