What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

Christianity.SE is IMO very different from other SE sites, because its subject is religious, and thus very prone to antagonistic viewpoints (like mine). I obviously expected my opinion to be not welcome there:

enter image description here

But I've been noticing also that my comments are disappearing (the post itself was also deleted). So, are antagonistic viewpoints welcome on SE sites like Christianity.SE?

share|improve this question
3  
Comments aren't expected to stick around –  random Sep 27 '11 at 22:12
4  
    
@random I personally didn't see anything egregious in my comments, but I am not asking why the comments were deleted. That statement is there to support the question. –  anon Sep 27 '11 at 22:17
7  
It's times like these that I pine for the good ol' "Subjective & Argumentative" close reason... –  Shog9 Sep 27 '11 at 22:33
3  
Of the two questions you had that received the most downvotes, one asked a question that was not backed by the information you cited, and the other was phrased in a way that insinuated that Christians are more gullible. They were bad questions, plain and simple. –  Brad Larson Sep 27 '11 at 23:02
2  
FWIW, I think that religious based sites should welcome opposing or non-conformist views, as long as it leads to robust and measured discussion. Anything just thrown in there as a troll should be eliminated. –  slugster Sep 28 '11 at 0:48

3 Answers 3

up vote 12 down vote accepted

I'm not a friend of organized religion, have nothing invested in Christianity.SE and probably never will, but what's the point of participating in a Christianity related site if you're an atheist?

It's like being fundamentally, totally opposed to every aspect of programming but still participating in Stack Overflow (or programmers.SE). It doesn't work.

As far as I'm concerned, unless one intends to contribute something truly constructive, one should not contribute to the religion sites at all.

share|improve this answer
1  
Seems like a good way to learn about an unfamiliar religion. –  Pops Sep 27 '11 at 22:51
2  
Preaching to the choir. Sites like Christianity.SE are a honeypot for this, though. –  user149432 Sep 27 '11 at 23:01

Writing on the wall

So you didn't expect your opinion to be welcome, observed that your opinion was not welcome, and you've now come here to ask us if your opinion is welcome?

Oh, what the hell. Yes, your opinion is welcome. Because SE sites luuuuurve opinions. There's even a close reason that mentions them, because we want them so badly. The more antagonistic, the better. Nothing we want more than some good ol' content-free flame-wars - this "useful Q&A" shtick just gets so boring! Please, jump on the next new SE site you see and share some opinions.

Or, y'know, read the FAQs, note the response that posting flame-bait garners, and adjust your behavior accordingly.

share|improve this answer
6  
@Null: you could argue that. But you didn't. In fact, your entire question could work pretty well as an answer to your question. I'm honestly not sure why you even bothered to ask; did you expect someone to say, "Yes, C.SE is different - unlike every other SE site, we want lots of arguments there". –  Shog9 Sep 27 '11 at 22:37
1  
That is kinda what I am asking. Do we? –  NullUserException อ_อ Sep 27 '11 at 22:39
7  
No. Good grief man, if it devolved into that, we'd just kill it. After three years of telling folks that we don't want holy-wars and that SE is a poor fit for discussion, why would we build a site purely for that purpose? The closest we've ever come would be Programmers, and that was... "redirected" right quick if you'll recall... –  Shog9 Sep 27 '11 at 22:43

Your question is based on a flawed premise.

In the comments, random linked to a meta discussion for Christianity.SE that clearly spells out why comments are being deleted: it's not about you having antagonistic viewpoints, but about keeping the site clean of off-topic and tangential discussions.

You link to a screenshot of downvotes you've received: you have no proof that people are downvoting you because you have an antagonistic viewpoint. You could have just as easily been downvoted because people view your posts to be wrong or not useful. This isn't Reddit: merely having an opinion doesn't mean people should or will up-vote you.

It's easy to dismiss negative feedback as "oh these people are just trying to supress my viewpoints", but I guarantee you will find Stack Exchange more enriching and rewarding if you take the negative feedback you received, consider it given in good faith, and see how you can improve on what you've been doing.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.