Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

In SO's FAQ, you declared

A question that gets opened and closed repeatedly many times without achieving community consensus on whether it should stay open or closed.

in the section "When should a post be locked?".

However, I'm wondering about the following situation: Only specific users that have the necessary privileges can open or close a question, and a question should be voted on to decide about its status, not in a personal dictatorship way.

Why is there such a description in the FAQ?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Rosinante, kiamlaluno, ChrisF, Pops, Lorem Ipsum Jan 28 '12 at 22:30

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Do you have a specific complaint here? – waffles Oct 9 '11 at 3:06
@waffles I'm puzzling about this, hope it can be explained... – f1098 Oct 9 '11 at 3:26
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Most of the time, voting will determine whether a question should be closed or not. But SO is a large community, and occasionally there will be a disagreement on whether a question should be closed. When this happens, it will be repeatedly opened and closed as the two sides argue over who is right. To prevent the fight from escalating, a moderator has the ability to determine whether a post should be open or closed and lock it, so that normal users can no longer vote to open or close it.

If someone feels strongly that the moderator chose wrong, they can come here to meta and start a discussion. This will allow the community to decide whether it should be opened or closed in a better system than the comments, and without fighting for control of the actual question. If a consensus is reached using this discussion, then a moderator can unlock the question and change the state as necessary.

share|improve this answer
Understood, thank you! – f1098 Oct 9 '11 at 3:46

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .