What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Is the number of edits at http://stackoverflow.com/users?tab=editors&filter=all the one that counts the edits relevant for gaining the Strunk & White and Copy Editor badges? (If not, wouldn't it be nice to have it that way? There's no reason for two different edit counts named the same.)

share|improve this question
1  
Currently we don't have any real "counter" for badge progress, and we won't have as Jeff want to keep some badges a "surprise". –  Shadow Wizard Oct 9 '11 at 12:47
    
@ShadowWizard: Thanks for the info. Does this mean Aziz's data.sx script isn't correct either? –  doncherry Oct 9 '11 at 12:49
    
The data dump is old (I think around a month) so it can never be really accurate.. –  Shadow Wizard Oct 9 '11 at 15:12
    
@ShadowWizard: Actually, the latest dump isn't quite a week old. Apart from that, is the script correct for the date the data was dumped? –  doncherry Oct 9 '11 at 15:15
1  
The most accurate script can be found here or in your case see here –  Shadow Wizard Oct 9 '11 at 15:22
    
@ShadowWizard That appears to count multiple edits on the same post. It's off by 34 for me on Android compared to my method. –  Matthew Read Oct 9 '11 at 16:15
    
1  
@MatthewRead thanks, yours show 550 edits for me while 557 in the other.. looks more accurate indeed then. –  Shadow Wizard Oct 9 '11 at 18:39
    
At some point, the team started displaying edit badge progress on the /review pages. It's not there right now because they're beta testing a new /review system. They'll bring it back once testing is done. –  Pops Jul 23 '12 at 20:22

2 Answers 2

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Nope, they're not the same, for two reasons:

  • The badge is intended to exclude specific (the trivial ones, mostly) edits, though there's no reason to exclude those counts for general recognition of those users on the /users page.
  • Performance would greatly suffer if we had to do the same checks as the badge did for all users every time that query did a re-sort, so it's partially for performance as well.
share|improve this answer
    
Is it not possible that you could stick the result of the last check you did for the badge into a table somewhere and have that and a time stamp visible? –  Flexo Oct 19 '11 at 20:09
    
@awoodland - not performance-wise for nearly a million users...nope. –  Nick Craver Oct 19 '11 at 20:11

No, the edit count shown on "Editors" tab could be different, I think it also includes "retags". To get an edit count that are eligible for "Strunk & White" badge, try running this query on data.stackexchange.com. Note, data.SE will not give you the latest count as the data is dumped every month:

SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT RevisionGUID)
FROM PostHistory
WHERE UserId = <YourUserId>
AND PostHistoryTypeId IN (4,5) -- 4 and 5 are post title and post body

"Strunk & White" is for those users who try to fix spellings and grammar of question titles and body.

share|improve this answer
    
I think you also need to take away self edits –  Sklivvz Oct 9 '11 at 15:13
    
And multiple edits on the same post don't count. Check out my query, so far as I've been able to determine it's accurate on the data dump. –  Matthew Read Oct 9 '11 at 16:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .