Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Often while looking back over an old question, I am unsure of exactly when the up- and down-votes summarized were given. It would be great to have a graphical summary, in the line of Tufte's Sparklines, right there on the page.

Sparklines could coexist with the numeric summary or could stand on their own when the vote was clicked for a second time.

Without sparklines

With sparklines

share|improve this question
I don't get why you'd need/want that. Why does this matter to you? – Mat Oct 16 '11 at 12:07
Actually such a timeline would make most sense if it also shows when revisions (and possibly comments) were made - usually an extensive revision is what will turn a question from being down- to being upvoted. – Jonas Heidelberg Oct 16 '11 at 12:26
You can use the question timeline for that I think. – Mat Oct 16 '11 at 20:18
This would be a great idea for a UserScript. – uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN Oct 16 '11 at 23:49
possible duplicate of Show the voting on specific posts over time – Chris Frederick Oct 17 '11 at 1:55
@Chris, thanks for pointing out the other Q. I definitely think it's related, but my question is specifically about Sparklines and therefore distinct. – Ari B. Friedman Oct 17 '11 at 2:06

This is a good suggestion. This distinguishes between questions or answers that were upvoted long ago, those that are upvoted on a continuing basis, and those that are most significant after some event (e.g. the posting of a better answer). Other distinctions may arise, but these 3 are interesting enough.

I think that this is more relevant for answers than questions. Suppose a question was posed in July 2010, 3 answers were given at that time, and then in July 2011 another answer was provided. The first three answers may have accumulated a lot more votes due to their longevity, but the answer from 7/11 may be upvoted a lot more among the three during the time after its post. This could well be due to a much better, cleaner answer.

Although SO doesn't seem to sort based on current "voting intensity", I believe the proposal is a graphical representation of this idea.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .