What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Can 'u' and 'i' part ways?

I've observed that a significant number of people use i instead of "I"

Sample : i create a iframe to get acess token in facebook but it require redirections to another page. and i dont get answer in the same iframe instead page entirely redirect.

In English this is incorrect but this can be corrected automatically without much effort in submission time. It will keep the stackoverflow "nice". Just thought to add this as a feature request.

UPDATE : We ignore "i" if they are in code sample tags.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by jonsca, ChrisF, slhck, kiamlaluno, George Stocker Oct 17 '11 at 12:16

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
I have an existing feature request for this, check out the link. –  jonsca Oct 17 '11 at 9:07
5  
does that mean we'll change "u" to "you" and "tks" to "thanks" and so on and so forth? Not capatilising I's and using text speak is just plain lazyness and SE should not make it easier to ignore or tolerate it. Granted, it's probably a bit of regex name matching, but there's probably better things for the SE team to be working on. –  tombull89 Oct 17 '11 at 9:18
    
@tombull89 I'm sure there are many other things that they are working on. I think this is important for people landing on the site via search engines. It makes everything just a bit more presentable. I know it doesn't correct the behavior, but I think its function as prevention could outweigh that of training (as is the case with other filters and corrections like removing the greeting from posts). –  jonsca Oct 17 '11 at 9:27
    
for (I = 0; I < 10; I++) printf("My C code doesn't agree\n"); –  Klas Lindbäck Oct 17 '11 at 13:24
1  
@Klas: The question already indicated that this wouldn't happen inside code blocks. Moreover, changing the case of a variable wouldn't affect the execution of the program. –  Josh Caswell Oct 17 '11 at 18:18
    
@ἸησοῦςCaswell: In some programming languages, variables may not begin with an upper case letter. –  hammar Oct 17 '11 at 20:50

3 Answers 3

What is this, Apple Autocorrect?

share|improve this answer
2  
iCorrect you mean? :-) –  xanatos Oct 17 '11 at 14:21
1  
@xanatos, er, no, I think it would be ICorrect :) –  Benjol Oct 19 '11 at 11:13

So the next time someone writes for i = 0... I won't even continue :-)

share|improve this answer
2  
For i = 0 should be written in code tags. We omit the tags without processing. I am talking about the text that are NOT in tags –  Chathuranga Chandrasekara Oct 17 '11 at 8:56
3  
@ChathurangaChandrasekara The ones that write i create forget even to format code :-) –  xanatos Oct 17 '11 at 8:57
    
hmm... Good point xanatos. But they will see the output and they will learn to format the code. Isn't it? –  Chathuranga Chandrasekara Oct 17 '11 at 9:00
    
@ChathurangaChandrasekara And the ones that receives -infinite to their questions and have their question closed learn to write better questions, right? :-) –  xanatos Oct 17 '11 at 9:01
1  
Yes, If a user really wants to get use of SO he should learn. If he/she face with that situation once, he/she have to (will) learn to how to write a question properly. I've never seen a user that writes questions of that type again and again. What do you think? –  Chathuranga Chandrasekara Oct 17 '11 at 9:07
    
If the quality filter is trained to pick up unformatted code, processing it as such would allow an "i", "u", etc. filter on a second pass which ignored code blocks. –  jonsca Oct 17 '11 at 9:10
2  
@Chathuranga: Code variables are not the only reason to use lowercase i. For example, with such feature you wouldn't be able to post your question as intended: I've observed that a significant number of people use i instead of "I" –  Goran Jovic Oct 17 '11 at 13:06
    
@GoranJovic I was trying to find a good composable dot in Unicode to merge with the Turkish dotless i but I wasn't able to find one similar enough :-( –  xanatos Oct 17 '11 at 13:34

I don't think such feature would help, at least not if it comes to SO.

An i often is used as counting variable in programming languages and automatically uppercasing it to I would yield strange results.

share|improve this answer
1  
Any such filter would probably have to ignore code blocks (and backtick'ed code) anyway. –  jonsca Oct 17 '11 at 9:11

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .