What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

This question was downvoted, and the downvote removed, and the user now has 3 rep, even though there are no reputation generating events on the user's page.

share|improve this question
    
Sweeeeet. 30 free rep for new users. –  Ian Elliott Jul 30 '09 at 13:18
    
@Ian: Only 2. ----------------- –  Daniel Daranas Jul 30 '09 at 13:20
4  
...unless you could find fifteen people to downvote, and then restore... –  Rowland Shaw Jul 30 '09 at 13:22
1  
At first I thought it was the users own votes that were removed until I realized he can't down vote. So technically you may be able to get 200 rep if people cast 100 down votes against you (lol) and then remove them. –  Ian Elliott Jul 30 '09 at 13:29
3  
They would have to remove them all at the same time though. –  Brad Gilbert Jul 30 '09 at 14:07
70  
So 'status-bydesign' in this case is equivalent to 'status-toolazytofix', right? –  Hilarious Comedy Pesto Jul 30 '09 at 14:10
5  
@Brad, I don't think so... They just have to place the original down vote while the user has 1 rep. You're always given 2 rep when vote against you is removed, but down votes don't remove rep if you only have 1. –  Ian Elliott Jul 30 '09 at 14:39
1  
@Brad, as proof, I just gave the user 7 rep. –  Ian Elliott Jul 30 '09 at 14:41
36  
So if you really want to welcome a 1-rep user, downvote his question, then remove the downvote (rep 3), then upvote (13). Your "power" to increase his rep has increased from 10 points to 12. –  Daniel Daranas Jul 30 '09 at 15:45
    
Apparently, "toolazytofix" and "by design" was not true: it was fixed, and the reverse is now true, your reps are not restored: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/29088/… –  Abel Nov 9 '09 at 12:37
6  
Just tested, and it is still the case that rep can be granted by downvoting and removing the downvote –  Rowland Shaw Nov 9 '09 at 15:36
    
@Abel, the question referenced in your comment above is probably based on community wiki behaviour. It does not seem to refer to any fix. –  Arjan Feb 12 '10 at 8:51

3 Answers 3

up vote 14 down vote accepted

This is no longer the case. Casting a downvote now records the actual value (0 change in this case) and reverses that 0 value upon removing it...the user will correctly stay at 1 reputation.

share|improve this answer

Did the user accept an answer. If so you get a bonus 2 rep and the answer gets 15.

So I was thinking he has asked some other question and then accepted an answer to it.

share|improve this answer
1  
(Nope. See the comments above.) –  Arjan Jan 24 '11 at 10:44
    
What user was it? –  Benny Jan 24 '11 at 10:45
1  
See Ian's comment above: A 1-rep user gets downvoted; this would normally subtract 2 rep. However you can't go below 1 rep so they stay at 1. Then the voter user cancels their downvote, which adds back the 2 subtracted rep to cancel the penalty. The problem is that it doesn't notice that no rep was actually subtracted in the first place because of the lower-limit of 1, and just adds 2 rep. –  Rup Jan 24 '11 at 11:28

It's "as designed" because the FAQ says:

  1. "A down vote on your Question or Answer is removed: +2".
  2. "A user's reputation may not drop below 1".

I'm guessing a reputation recalc will fix this "by design" anomaly.

share|improve this answer
6  
a reputation recalc processes all things in order, so a user can receive 10 downvotes and a single upvote and still have a score of 6 - if the upvote was the last thing to happen. –  Rowland Shaw Feb 3 '11 at 14:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .