What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

Imgur is blocked by two of the private ISPs we use. Is there a workaround without involving tunnelling?

Bear in mind that Filmot (an Imgur mirror) and Flickr are also blocked.

share|improve this question
11  
The best thing might be if you managed to convince your ISP to unblock it if not for all but for you. –  N.N. Oct 21 '11 at 17:15
4  
I can't imagine why they would block it anyway –  Simon Sheehan Oct 21 '11 at 19:56
    
@SimonSheehan: Any internet filter that wanted to block Reddit would probably want to block Imgur as well. It accounts for an enormous portion of Reddit's content (particularly the type that is likely to be blocked) and Imgur indexes its content by subreddit rankings: imgur.com/r/pics –  Jeremy Banks Oct 21 '11 at 20:23

2 Answers 2

Stack Overflow's hosting is managed by Imgur, but it's no longer integrated into the Imgur website in any way. There's no reason to be under imgur.com, a domain that's likely to be blocked by many internet filters because of the amount of porn it hosts.

Switching to something like http://i.sstatic.net/ should fix this problem. (Imgur uses EdgeCast so IP-based blocks are unlikely.) It would also make their URLs host-agnostic, preventing the need for any more mass-replacements of URLs after this one.

...but for all we know this might violate Stack Exchange's deal with Imgur and be impossible for now.

share|improve this answer
    
This would prevent a future Images stackexchange site from popping up, though. :) –  Kevin Vermeer Oct 21 '11 at 17:51
    
Also, http://images.stackexchange.com/ is long. http://i.stack.imgur.com is pretty long, but it's 2/3 the length of your proposal. I suggest http://i.s.tk/ (to be consistent with Imgur's i.imgur) or http://images.s.tk to be verbose. –  Kevin Vermeer Oct 21 '11 at 17:52
    
I like http://i.s.tk/, I've updated my post with it. –  Jeremy Banks Oct 21 '11 at 17:55
2  
@Kevin Why in the world does it matter if the image URL is "long"? –  Michael Mrozek Oct 21 '11 at 18:49
2  
@MichaelMrozek - So that we can fit it in comments, tweets, etc, so that it's quick to type, so that you can fit ![alt text](link) on one line, so that an inlined link doesn't make it hard to read a paragraph, because I don't want to waste RAM by loading something from a longer domain name, and I want to make my network requests faster. (The last two were a joke, the others weren't). –  Kevin Vermeer Oct 21 '11 at 18:55
3  
@Kevin I'm pretty sure every one of those reasons is ridiculous, but I get the opinion the "short URLs are ridiculous" argument is already lost –  Michael Mrozek Oct 21 '11 at 19:02
1  
Since the images are now hosted under the URL http://i.stack.imgur.com, rather than http://i.imgur.com, I was able to persuade our IT people to unblock that particular URL. If your IT folks have a problem with it, just tell them that it's part of Stack Exchange and that Stack Overflow, etc. are hobbled without the images coming through. That should weigh the argument in your favour. –  RobH Oct 25 '13 at 16:38
    
@RobH You are forgetting about bureaucracy/regulation keeping such a request stuck in processing for months. –  hexafraction May 22 at 20:53

As a follow up, and a potential answer, I don't think it would "cost" much to buy a new url, and let's call it stackur or something like that to host the images. IT will still have the imgur backend, just a different url.

share|improve this answer
    
Why a new domain? –  lunboks Nov 23 '11 at 12:48
    
@lunboks imgur is blocked by many IT folks –  dassouki Nov 23 '11 at 12:54
1  
Wouldn't they simply block this new URL for whatever reason they might have for blocking imgur already? –  Yi Jiang Nov 23 '11 at 12:56
1  
Not really sure about that, I think the issue with imgur is that it's used by lots of media site, has pornographic images on it, –  dassouki Nov 23 '11 at 12:59
    
@dassouki I meant why a new domain, as opposed to simply using an existing one. Something like i.s.tk (as Kevin Vermeer proposed) or i.sstatic.net should work just fine. –  lunboks Nov 23 '11 at 16:55
    
@lunboks I misread his answer. I'll delete mine in a few minutes so you can read this comment first –  dassouki Nov 23 '11 at 16:58
    
@dassouki so we just need to find an inexpensive, reliable and accessible image host that will actively monitor the content that is posted there? –  Ryan Gates May 16 '13 at 20:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .