Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

We have a number of exceedingly common meta questions:

  • Force a comment on downvote (my inspiration for this)
  • Why was my question closed?
  • Why can't I post questions any more?
  • Anything about flags being declined and folks crying about it
  • ...dozens of others...

Is it feasible/desirable to add some sort of check for known frequent duplicates that redirects the asker to the canonical question on that topic BEFORE they are able to post the question?

I'm sure it wouldn't be 100% effective, but if you check for (comment|anonymous) and downvot(e|ing) in the title, for instance, we could (potentially) reduce a lot of the noise.

Maybe even add a pseudo-captcha after the redirect to confirm they actually read it (What does Jeff's answer propose as popup text to encourage comments?) that must be entered to proceed.

I know we don't want to make it too difficult, but THIS IS META so barriers to entry can be a little higher I'm assuming.

share|improve this question
@PopularDemand Thanks, good associated resource. – JNK Oct 25 '11 at 20:56
+1 because you're right about how much noise there is and I voted to close that question, -1 because i don't think your idea will work... – The Unhandled Exception Oct 25 '11 at 21:13

But... we already have this!


The problem, I believe, is not with the system but with the people. People are generally annoying and as much as you try to get them to behave and follow rules and read directions, a vast majority will just do whatever they want.

This is why we have down votes and close votes, LOL.

What I'd really like to see is an automatic comment added linking to everytime someone on meta whines about being downvoted.

share|improve this answer
+1 for "People are generally annoying" – slhck Oct 25 '11 at 21:13
+1 for automatic comment on vote differences. Well, when I can vote again in 2 hours, that is. You ought to make that a feature request! – Kevin Vermeer Oct 25 '11 at 21:35
@Kevin: done -- I don't expect much however, other than a status-declined – The Unhandled Exception Oct 25 '11 at 21:42
And I got what I expected! – The Unhandled Exception Oct 26 '11 at 12:10

Nice idea, but I don't know if a keyword search is the way to go about it. Seems to me that there would be a lot of false positives, and probably false negatives as well. It'd be nice to see a data dump query for your proposed checks. It wouldn't catch deleted posts, but most duplicates just languish in closed status forever instead of getting deleted.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .