What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 150 Stack Exchange communities.

- 15 questions

- 25 questions

- 29 questions

I suggest we merge -> and -> .

Rationale: seems to be the most popular tag, and I believe these tags all mean the same thing. is just an abbreviated form of , and all questions tagged are also tagged , so seems redundant. Also note that all questions tagged are also tagged as well, and some are tagged too.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, rene, ProgramFOX, Shadow Wizard, mmyers Jul 11 '14 at 21:58

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, rene, ProgramFOX, Shadow Wizard, mmyers
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Given that knr does not have a tag wiki and most people will not know that it means, I don't think it is a good merge target. – Ian Ringrose Nov 2 '11 at 10:45
@Ian good point about the wiki... I was going to write an excerpt for [knr] but didn't want to duplicate the excerpt across the various tags, so I got sidetracked... – Jason Plank Nov 2 '11 at 11:02
How about [kernighan-and-ritchie-c] or [k-and-r-c]? IMO, it's perfectly OK to have 'c' in the tag - See the examples of c89, c99, and c1x. – Kevin Vermeer Nov 2 '11 at 12:01
@Kevin Are you suggesting those as merge targets? I wouldn't mind [k-and-r-c]. And FWIW, [c89], [c99], and [c1x] seem to be directly related to C and would be meaningless without C in their names, so I agree that it's okay there. The way I see it, the meaning for any of the K&R tags is the same and refers to the famous book The C Programming Language, with or without a C in the tag. If the community feels that we need to throw a C in the merge target, that's fine with me-- let's just get a synonym here. – Jason Plank Nov 2 '11 at 12:22
Yes, I was. Given that the tags don't have wikis, I assumed that the tags referred to the version of the language, like these questions: stackoverflow.com/q/3092006, stackoverflow.com/q/1542023, stackoverflow.com/q/1466521 - But, on further investigation, you're right - Most of the questions are about the book. Perhaps we need two tags, one for the book and one for the language? I agree that something needs to happen. – Kevin Vermeer Nov 2 '11 at 12:53
@Kevin Thanks for those examples, I had overlooked that it was also possible to use it to differentiate from ANSI C. So there indeed are two distinct meanings, then. – Jason Plank Nov 2 '11 at 12:59
Here's another vote for knr being the merge target. It has a tag wiki now. – Michael Kristofik Aug 24 '12 at 13:36
Googling "knr" doesn't give very good C-related results, "and" doesn't start with an "n", and I'd never seen K&R abbreviated that way before I saw that tag. This still needs some kind of synonym/merge action, though, 2 years later. – Wooble Jan 10 '14 at 16:40
@Wooble ""and" doesn't start with an "n", " - tell that to these guys – AakashM Jan 10 '14 at 16:53
@AakashM: granted, "and" is often contracted to "'n'". I'm just not convinced it's commonly done with Kernighan 'n' Ritchie. Although I suppose people saying "K&R" fast may sound like they're saying "KNR". Still seems like a stretch to use it as a tag name. It's probably telling that searching Google for "KNR C" asks if you meant "K&R C" :) – Wooble Jan 10 '14 at 16:56