Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Please burninate the tag.

It adds no value and appears to have been used haphazardly.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Undo, Martijn Pieters, Al E., animuson, Monica Cellio May 15 '14 at 1:34

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Undo, Martijn Pieters, Al E., animuson, Monica Cellio
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Should [infinite-loop] be burninated, if [stuck] is burninated? – Andrew Grimm Nov 9 '11 at 3:54
@AndrewGrimm, [infinite-loop] appears to be serving a purpose. [Stuck] appears to be tagged randomly for a variety of meta and looping scenarios. Perhaps a few "stuck" questions could be retagged as [infinite loop]? A tag synonym made? Probably better just to burninate "stuck" and not look back. – Awesome Poodles Nov 9 '11 at 4:00
People can use [infinite-loop] to describe a particular way in which their program isn't working. [Stuck] could be used to describe e.g. a deadlock by someone who doesn't know the correct terminology, but my bet is that it's used mostly by students who are [stuck] on their assignments. – Kevin Nov 26 '11 at 16:11
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I think it's best to both retag it, so they get their tag or whichever they need; and burninate it, so it doesn't reappear in the future.

Whenever something is stuck, it is frozen or hangs. It is an important detail to the question, but the tag itself is indeed unnecessary as it does not tell what exactly has happened.

share|improve this answer
With only 30 questions (at the time of writing) this is a) sensible and b) feasible. – ChrisF Nov 26 '11 at 16:33
@ChrisF, there were over 40 "stuck" questions when I posted this question. Now there are 0 and it looks like Mat has edited every question, bless him. – Awesome Poodles Nov 26 '11 at 17:13
I'll give Mat a few hours (I'm going offline) to post an answer, since he did all that work. Otherwise, this looks like the answer. – Awesome Poodles Nov 26 '11 at 17:17
@BrockAdams - I did a few too ;) But even at 40+ it was still sensible to do manually. – ChrisF Nov 26 '11 at 17:21
@ChrisF: Yes, and I have retagged many dozens of posts in such efforts. But one of the tags ("STS" IIRC) rises from the dead periodically. That's why I was hoping for a more permanent (and probably dead-easy), SQL-based fix. Still, I don't know why I forgot to come back after a couple of weeks and do this tag the hard way. – Awesome Poodles Nov 26 '11 at 17:30
Yeah, that's why I was hoping for a proper "burninate". Just 3 hours ago, someone posted a question with the offending tag. So, I'll subscribe to that tag and play whack-a-mole for... (^_^) – Awesome Poodles Nov 27 '11 at 1:43

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .