What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 149 Stack Exchange communities.

From a categorization perspective, I feel creating particular sites for each aspect of religion eats up needless room, and spreads the religious answers thinner than they need be. I'm not going to exaggerate and bring up every minority religion's lack of representation, and every biblical text, but I would have expected that having one site would help form more cohesion in the community, especially since religion is a very synergistic subject. The crossover knowledge from religion to religion would be impressive to see.

I would have expected there to be one religion site, that used tags to identify which religions/issues were involved in a particular answer.

Has this been discussed?

... Is the community afraid of locking different religions into the same site? ;)

share|improve this question
Can you really see people getting on on one site? –  ChrisF Nov 10 '11 at 13:32
Practically speaking? I think that every religion has fringe fanatic groups that are over highlighted, but the majority of people would be fine. travel.stackexchange.com manages to keep itself from imploding. –  Bob Nov 10 '11 at 13:43
@Bob - You should look at the discussions on the separate sites. Jewish people will not normally be interested in questions about any Sura any more than most Muslims would be interested in the latest Halacha about washing hands. The different religions have much minutia that would be of little interest to those of other religions. –  Oded Nov 10 '11 at 13:46
By the same token someone using ajax with PHP could care less about the latest Ruby question, and yet stackoverflow seems to get on well enough. –  Bob Nov 10 '11 at 13:48
Yes, and the (language) religious wars need to be quashed, as soon as someone tries to start one. Religion, however, tends to stir emotions much more than choice of programming language. –  Oded Nov 10 '11 at 13:51
Use Macs vs PCs if you wish then ;). It sounded like a good idea to me, but if I'm the only one who thinks this is feasible then I'll concede to the greater knowledge of the community. –  Bob Nov 10 '11 at 13:53
@Bob - I grew up in Jerusalem. Can't say I am an authority, but trust me on this one ;) –  Oded Nov 10 '11 at 13:56
This is just asking for trouble - would this site also merge with atheists.stackexchange.com and trolls.stackexchange.com? –  Paul Bellora Nov 10 '11 at 14:08
+1 for the interesting question, but I'm with the rest that it's asking for flame wars. –  GUI Junkie Nov 10 '11 at 14:13
I'm impressed that so many people have opinions about this, but not one person has answered. I suppose that says something in itself. It's a sobering thought to think that mankind still has so far to go. –  Bob Nov 10 '11 at 14:27
@Bob It's couldn't care less. If they "could care less", then that means they do care to some degree. youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw –  Widor Nov 10 '11 at 15:04
In the context of web languages they do care to some degree, but if it makes you feel better I'll stand corrected. :) –  Bob Nov 10 '11 at 15:15
@Bob That feels much better, thanks. –  Widor Nov 10 '11 at 15:24
@Oded I'm not so sure.... I've had some more heated debates over programming languages than religions. –  Phil Lello Nov 10 '11 at 23:34
@PhilLello - Well, how religious are you? And how religious the people you have debated with? And were they of other religions? –  Oded Nov 11 '11 at 8:47

2 Answers 2

up vote 16 down vote accepted

What does it mean that a site "eats up needless room?" — In an academic sense, it would be nice to see everyone collaborating on the world's religions… but those you listed are not academic sites.

They are not interchangeable subjects you might pick and choose between based on the context of your problem (like choosing a programming language on Stack Overflow). The members of these communities aren't interested in the local catch-all "religion expert" to weigh in on their deeply-held religious beliefs. These are applied sites, not tags under some academic "world religion" study.

Sites and their subjects are formed around communities; communities with common goals, problems, and interests. The Christians and Jews on those sites want to consult and commune with those who are of the same teachings and belief system.

In the blog post Merging Season, Joel came up with a set of rules to see if is site X should be subsumed by site Y. So let's substitute "Christianity" for (X) and "Judaism" for (Y), and see if this marriage of subjects sounds like a good match.

Here’s the best we could come up with for deciding whether X [Christianity] should be subsumed by Y [Judaism]:

  1. Almost all Christianity questions are on-topic for Judaism.
  2. If [a subject for] Judaism already exists, it already has a tag for Christianity, and nobody is complaining
  3. You’re not creating such a big group that you don’t have enough experts to answer all possible questions
  4. There’s a high probability that users of Judaism would enjoy seeing the occasional question about Christianity.

The missive above doesn't sound workable to me, but whether you agree or not with that technical assessment, there is still one incontrovertible problem: Users seeking answers to their deepest "expert" questions on Judaism (or Christianity) are not going to show up on a generic "religion" forum — And site is not much good to a group of users if they will not show up.

share|improve this answer

Becouse the same question has a different right answer depending on your religion.

share|improve this answer
Fair enough, I suppose. –  Bob Nov 10 '11 at 14:29
Although, the same can be said for software methodologies... waterfall vs agile, unit vs integration test, top-down vs bottom-up –  Phil Lello Nov 10 '11 at 23:35
@PhilLello, yet but most programmer often use more then one of them so there is a big overlap of experts –  Ian Ringrose Nov 11 '11 at 10:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .