Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The idea is to award this badge when you get +5 and -5 votes on an answer.

share|improve this question
Justify your request. What positive behavior is this badge designed to motivate? – Michael Petrotta Nov 11 '11 at 16:09
@NullUserExceptionஇ_இ: How the hell did you find that? – Matt Nov 11 '11 at 16:19
@nulluserexception Yes, that would be one of many examples. – karlphillip Nov 11 '11 at 16:40
@Matt That question got some attention yesterday and NullUserException is a frequent colaborator of the site, I imagine he saw it yesterday. – karlphillip Nov 11 '11 at 16:43
@NullUserException_: What about this? At least make it harder... +10/-10 or +20/-20 – Won't Nov 11 '11 at 17:21
@ಠ_ಠWon't Won't:… – NullUserException อ_อ Nov 11 '11 at 17:27
Did you deliberately move the smiley to the left so it would be hard to autocomplete your name? – NullUserException อ_อ Nov 11 '11 at 17:28
@karlphillip: Even this question itself deserves the badge – MoJo Mar 4 '13 at 6:18
up vote 9 down vote accepted

No, a million times no.

"Controversial" answers are usually bad answers that people who don't know better vote up. Like this one.

share|improve this answer
-1 I'm inclined to disagree with "are usually bad answers". But I respect your point of view. – karlphillip Nov 11 '11 at 16:46
The "usually bad answers" part is probably right, not that I have any data. People tend to upvote things they think are right and downvote things they know are wrong – Michael Mrozek Nov 11 '11 at 16:49
@MichaelMrozek: You should weight the ratio of upvotes to downvotes. A +300 -5 question probably isn't wrong. – Devin Burke Nov 11 '11 at 18:24

Aside from the question as to the usefulness of this badge, your +5 -5 suggestion also has issues. For example, it's the tendency of very highly voted questions to get at least five downvotes. It doesn't make sense for a +200 -5 question to earn a "Controversial" badge.

For example, most of the highest voted questions on RegEx match open tags except XHTML self-contained tags would earn (or come very close to earning) the badge even though it is clearly not warranted.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .