What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

There are currently 3500+ results for "loose focus" on Stack Overflow, the vast majority of which are misspellings of "lose focus".

Is this worth addressing, and if so, how?

I am aware of other ongoing efforts to perform bulk-cleanup of a large volume of posts, but I'm not sure if the same thing is necessary here, or desirable by the community.

share|improve this question
2  
I'm amazed at how 3000 or so people cannot spell lose... –  Simon Sheehan Nov 11 '11 at 20:19
9  
@SimonSheehan or the same person 3,000 times :) –  ChrisF Nov 11 '11 at 20:24
    
It is worth mentioning that the problem is common to every site in the SE network. Server Fault has lots of talk about "loosing connections", for example :| –  meagar Nov 11 '11 at 20:31
3  
The same problem is common to every site on the entire internet. Part of me wonders if lose -> loose is possibly the most common misspelling around. –  Grace Note Nov 11 '11 at 20:33
    
No that would be its/it's or your/you're. –  Toomai Nov 11 '11 at 20:47
    
@Toomai I still think of "it's" instead of "its" because it's like agf's / meagar's / etc. and have to mentally beat myself into submission as I type. But I doubt that is nearly as easy to autocorrect as the loose / lose pair. –  agf Nov 11 '11 at 21:21
10  
The problem with bulk corrections like this is their loose focus. –  Ben Brocka Nov 11 '11 at 21:35
    
@Ben The question is, would there be fewer errors after a mass loose->lose correction? Would the change result in less than 3500 errors afterwards? –  meagar Nov 12 '11 at 0:30
    
@meagar I understand and I would assume that significantly less than half of those "loose focus" statements are correct, but I would never would to auto-correct things like this unless A) it was a serious problem and B) it significantly impacted readability. IMO it's neither of these things and I'd hate to set precedent to autocorrect things based on this. I do like Truth's suggestion of making it a "low quality" style indicator that makes it show up in review though. If possible it would be a good inclusion in out "low quality" algorithm. –  Ben Brocka Nov 12 '11 at 1:09

1 Answer 1

I am aware of other Q/A sites which have some very good bots built to address these kinds of issues. The bot identifies the potential misspelling, and batch displays it to a moderator or a community tool (such as the reviewing tool).

The problem can be fixed by the corresponding people then.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .