Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When a trivial answer contains links in the form:

[link][1] info info

[1]:http://example.com

When they are converted to a comment, the links get mangled to something like:

[link][2] info info [1]:http://example.com

Can we please have better logic in the conversion?

Alternatively, if the answer contains a link, do not consider it to be trivial.

Update:

Just to clarify that what I would like to see is that answers with that get converted, get converted properly.

If the answer was using the following link style:

[link][3] info info 

 [1]:http://example.com

It should get converted to:

[link](http://example.com) info info

Instead of:

[link][4] info info [1]:http://example.com

Update:

This is still happening. Just seen in the wild:

enter image description here

share|improve this question
    
here is a proper [example][1]. [1]: meta.stackexchange.com/q/112742/140505 – Oded Nov 18 '11 at 11:19
    
The comment above ^^^^ was automatically converted from an answer with a link. – Oded Nov 18 '11 at 11:22
3  
If the answer is just a link then it is trivial. The link should only be used to back up the answer. – ChrisF Nov 18 '11 at 11:24
    
Does the automatic conversion work only for users with a reputation lower than a value? I tried in the sandbox here on meta, and the answer was not converted in a comment. – kiamlaluno Nov 18 '11 at 11:33
    
@ChrisF - And if it is a few words and a link? I tend to do that and then expand. – Oded Nov 18 '11 at 11:37
3  
Obviously there are borderline cases which would need determining, but posting link + a few words to get the first answer in isn't a reason to allow the behaviour. – ChrisF Nov 18 '11 at 12:09
    
@Arjan - Looks like you sparked off this question being closed... help! – Oded Nov 22 '11 at 22:00
    
(Hmmm, was this the question to which I commented I did not support my own close vote? That comment is gone now then, but I see things have been re-opened, so no sweat I hope.) – Arjan Nov 23 '11 at 12:43
    
@Arjan - Yes, this is the same question, I flagged it to the moderators after it was closed, so it looks like they re-opened it. – Oded Nov 23 '11 at 13:32
    
How is this not a duplicate? – Michael Mrozek Dec 14 '11 at 19:54
    
@Fezziwig - There was a similar question about the moderators tool (which supposedly was fixed). This is not about that tool but about the automatic conversion. – Oded Dec 14 '11 at 19:56
    
Ah. I would really hope they use the same code, but maybe not – Michael Mrozek Dec 14 '11 at 19:57
    
@Fezziwig - Well... they might be and the moderation tool regressed... – Oded Dec 14 '11 at 19:58
    
This is still happening, see my comment here, should the status-completed tag be removed or should I ask a new question? – Dukeling May 7 '13 at 14:26
3  
Why is this by design? If the syntax won't be fixed during conversion then why bother converting it? – BoltClock's a Unicorn May 7 '13 at 14:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .