Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

One of my recent suggested edits, for this question, was rejected. I also went ahead and answered the question and my answer was accepted by the user.

I think the fact my answer was accepted demonstrates that I understood the question, and I believe that my edits would have given the question more attention in general from other users with the potential to answer the question. I'm not terribly concerned about rep, I'm just curious about how to proceed in a case like this. Should I resubmit the suggested edits? Is there some sort of appeal process? Since the answer is accepted should I even bother?

share|improve this question
How is How can I define this SQL Schema? more specific than How to handle different user types by using groups?? Your modified title provides absolutely no details as to the content of the question that the tags don't already identify. – animuson Nov 26 '11 at 20:36
You're right, the tags do address that to some level. – Bert Evans Nov 26 '11 at 20:45
up vote 16 down vote accepted

There is no mechanism to appeal rejected edits.

Looks like you have removed some tags, which may be why the edit was rejected.

You can always edit the question again and supply more details in the reason (and be a little more judicial in your edits).

share|improve this answer
Alright. I disagree with the decision and think my edit actually helps the user. Is there any course forward or does it just stand until I have the appropriate rep? – Bert Evans Nov 26 '11 at 20:28
@BertEvans - Two other users with appropriate rep thought your edit was not good. There is no mechanism to appeal these decisions. I suggest you edit again, but more prudently. – Oded Nov 26 '11 at 20:36
@BertEvans: There is, of course, the possibility that you are wrong ;) – Adam Robinson Nov 26 '11 at 20:43
Heh, absolutely! – Bert Evans Nov 26 '11 at 20:46
I just made changes to a code snippet that wouldn't compile as is. The changes were minor, but had to be applied throughout the code. Four reviewers weighed in: one approved the edit, two rejected it for changing too much, and one for being too minor a change. – biscuit314 Mar 2 '14 at 18:15
@Oded I got one edit rejected. Two mods approved it but later three failed to notice that previous formatting did not include last parentheses and did not format the url at all. Should I edit it again and send it for approval by citing these details? You can see it here. – NSNoob Nov 13 '15 at 8:04
@NSNoob - I would have rejected that too. The formatting change is minimal and not particularly helpful (I don't really care about the last brace, the code in general is already readable and formatted correctly). Making "Ans at" a link and not even fixing the wording and explaining what that means? This was a bad edit. – Oded Nov 13 '15 at 8:11
@Oded Thanks for swift response and explanation. Got it! the ans at thing was due to lack of information by the OP. I could have made it "You can find answer here" and make here a hyperlink but that would have been going too far or even vandalizing the answer. Good thing I confirmed it here first before making the same mistake all over again. – NSNoob Nov 13 '15 at 8:12

You can bring it up in the site's chat, e.g., "Anything wrong with my suggested edit here?".

This is what I did when my edit on Ask Different got rejected. A local high-rep user (actually, a mod) agreed with the edit, and implemented it himself. No +2 for me, but that wasn't the point of editing.

share|improve this answer

I was hit by this issue as well: my edit was approved by two editors, and rejected by others. Those who rejected it had no experience whatsoever with the subject matter (MongoDB).

It is highly frustrating that people with experience in one domain, can wield their power in areas they are not competent in. If society worked that way, then Albert Einstein would be allowed to perform brain surgery.


  1. do implement a mechanism to challenge rejected edits
  2. or, disallow editors from accepting/rejecting an edit if they don't have experience with any of the tags of the question
share|improve this answer
You should have provided a new answer. The fact that the answer was accepted doesn't matter. If there's new information that renders an old answer obsolete then that information should be in a new answer. – ChrisF Nov 4 '12 at 23:57
I provided a comment, because I'm realistic that new answers with zero votes most likely won't be read when existing answers have 6 votes, and are accepted. – Dan Dascalescu Nov 4 '12 at 23:58
In that case comment rather than edit the answer. – ChrisF Nov 5 '12 at 0:02
rolleyes I guess I'll just have to give up. – Dan Dascalescu Nov 5 '12 at 0:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .