Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The definition of a meta tag from SO's Tag Privileges is:

Tags that cannot stand alone as the only tag on a question

The tag has no followers, no tag wiki, and multiple questions tagged with a specific language that is being asked about.

It seems that it would be pretty hard to create a question tagged with just . Of course it's possible for somebody to come up with an example question that would be suitable for being solely tagged .

But is catering to that minute amount of questions really worth users improperly tagging their questions? What does the really tell us about a question that couldn't be determined from just reading the question?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Monica Cellio, Ward, Aziz Shaikh, S.L. Barth, ben is uǝq backwards Oct 1 '15 at 5:27

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Monica Cellio, Ward, Aziz Shaikh, S.L. Barth, ben is uǝq backwards
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 10 down vote accepted

The succinctness of that privilege wiki is misleading.

is not so much a meta tag as it is a badly named tag (that has resulted into its growth as a plain ol' bad tag). Meta tags are those that describe the question, not the problem. Like used to, and still does. They're bad because they don't give you any information about the problem at all, which is why they never work as the only tag.

isn't a meta tag because even though it's an adjective (which is a problem of its own), it actually isn't used to describe the question itself. The vast majority of questions with the tag are about negative numbers as values. Arithmetic with negative values, date stamps with negative values, negative indices in arrays... all of this is actually a part of each problem. In that sense, it's actually been a noun-type tag that ended up adapted as an adjective because of its bad name. A proper name for the tag would have been or .

Not every question currently in the tag would fit with such a rename. This one just doesn't fit at all, while this one doesn't actually have to do with negative values. Meanwhile, this one is about negation, not negative numbers.

share|improve this answer
@kiam That wasn't a mistake - negative isn't describing the question (aka the post). – Grace Note Nov 27 '11 at 16:11
I apologize: I misunderstood what you were saying. I would say that it's a meta tag if it describes the topic of the question (e.g. c says the topic is an aspect of the C language), while a meta tag describes who asked the question (e.g. beginner) or other aspects of the question (e.g. homework). – kiamlaluno Nov 27 '11 at 16:42
@kiam You might've meant "not a meta tag" in one of those two. – Grace Note Nov 27 '11 at 16:43
Yep. The first part should be, "it is not a meta tag if it describes the topic of the question." It's funny, to get confused about meta tags on Meta Stack Overflow. (By the way, should not Meta Stack Overflow use just meta tags? :-)) – kiamlaluno Nov 27 '11 at 16:55

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .