Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I just destroyed a spam user, and noticed that one of their posts, which is to this question:

Require anonymous user to register to add content-type

Is the seventh spam answer to be deleted. I looked at the question and noticed it wasn't automatically protected by Community♦ already, so I've gone ahead to protect it myself.

Why wasn't this question automatically protected? According to this feature request, a question is auto-protected after three answers from new users are deleted. Did the accounts responsible for the other spam answers somehow escape the low-rep threshold?

share|improve this question
It looks like only two of those answers were deleted as spam and the rest were simply deleted as normal. Dunno if that's relevant. – Adam Lear Nov 30 '11 at 4:03
Judging by the content of those posts, the users were probably destroyed from their profile pages. – Bill the Lizard Nov 30 '11 at 4:04
Does anyone else think the spam posts are ironic, given the question's title? Maybe someone is trying to make a point. :) – Awesome Poodles Nov 30 '11 at 4:06
@BrockAdams I was just scratching my head wondering why that was attracting so much of the absolute worst kind of spam. :) – Bill the Lizard Nov 30 '11 at 4:07
What are the dates of spam deletion? – random Nov 30 '11 at 4:10
@random: All in the last three months. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Nov 30 '11 at 4:11
So it's possible the other spam deleted were before the auto-protect was in place, leaving you with a fresh slate of needing three deleted to trigger it from whenever the commit was pushed – random Nov 30 '11 at 4:12
What's the deal with all the spam answers on that post? Do people who are interested in Drupal anonymous user registration also have a natural affinity for designer hand bags? – Robert Harvey Nov 30 '11 at 4:17
@RobertHarvey Anyone advertising handbags on Stack Overflow obviously has their finger firmly on the pulse of the community. It is what we crave. – Bill the Lizard Nov 30 '11 at 4:20
Lizard bags. :D – Robert Harvey Nov 30 '11 at 4:27
11 – tombull89 Nov 30 '11 at 8:16
Yep, that's one of mine. My [feature-requests] are all made of pure awesome and win. – Won't Nov 30 '11 at 15:00
@Wont status-confirmed – cat May 11 at 10:37
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Sorry this fell off our radar for so long...

But as part of our spam-fighting initiative that's been ramping up for the past few months, this is now implemented. Spam deletions now count towards the threshold at which a post is auto-protected.

share|improve this answer

For this particular case it appears the owners from the deleted questions were all destroyed - no OwnerUserId = no way to check reputation thresholds. We will look at adding another threshold around protecting posts with many destroyed users as this could also be a sign of a spam storm / abuse.

share|improve this answer
Based on this and this – is there a possibility to add such a check? – slhck Aug 7 '12 at 10:50
Is this [status-planned] yet? The behavior is the same as of Feb 2013 - destroyed users don't count toward auto-protection. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Feb 12 '13 at 9:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .