What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 150 Stack Exchange communities.

I just destroyed a spam user, and noticed that one of their posts, which is to this question:

Require anonymous user to register to add content-type

Is the seventh spam answer to be deleted. I looked at the question and noticed it wasn't automatically protected by Community♦ already, so I've gone ahead to protect it myself.

Why wasn't this question automatically protected? According to this feature request, a question is auto-protected after three answers from new users are deleted. Did the accounts responsible for the other spam answers somehow escape the low-rep threshold?

share|improve this question
It looks like only two of those answers were deleted as spam and the rest were simply deleted as normal. Dunno if that's relevant. – Adam Lear Nov 30 '11 at 4:03
Judging by the content of those posts, the users were probably destroyed from their profile pages. – Bill the Lizard Nov 30 '11 at 4:04
Does anyone else think the spam posts are ironic, given the question's title? Maybe someone is trying to make a point. :) – Awesome Poodles Nov 30 '11 at 4:06
@BrockAdams I was just scratching my head wondering why that was attracting so much of the absolute worst kind of spam. :) – Bill the Lizard Nov 30 '11 at 4:07
What are the dates of spam deletion? – random Nov 30 '11 at 4:10
@random: All in the last three months. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Nov 30 '11 at 4:11
So it's possible the other spam deleted were before the auto-protect was in place, leaving you with a fresh slate of needing three deleted to trigger it from whenever the commit was pushed – random Nov 30 '11 at 4:12
What's the deal with all the spam answers on that post? Do people who are interested in Drupal anonymous user registration also have a natural affinity for designer hand bags? – Robert Harvey Nov 30 '11 at 4:17
@RobertHarvey Anyone advertising handbags on Stack Overflow obviously has their finger firmly on the pulse of the community. It is what we crave. – Bill the Lizard Nov 30 '11 at 4:20
Lizard bags. :D – Robert Harvey Nov 30 '11 at 4:27
so...many...diamonds... – tombull89 Nov 30 '11 at 8:16
Yep, that's one of mine. My [feature-requests] are all made of pure awesome and win. – Won't Nov 30 '11 at 15:00

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Sorry this fell off our radar for so long...

But as part of our spam-fighting initiative that's been ramping up for the past few months, this is now implemented. Spam deletions now count towards the threshold at which a post is auto-protected.

share|improve this answer

For this particular case it appears the owners from the deleted questions were all destroyed - no OwnerUserId = no way to check reputation thresholds. We will look at adding another threshold around protecting posts with many destroyed users as this could also be a sign of a spam storm / abuse.

share|improve this answer
Based on this and this – is there a possibility to add such a check? – slhck Aug 7 '12 at 10:50
Is this [status-planned] yet? The behavior is the same as of Feb 2013 - destroyed users don't count toward auto-protection. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Feb 12 '13 at 9:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .