Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I just posted a question on Stack Overflow, and had to change my title. It had the word 'question' in the title and when I first posted I received this message:

please do not use these words in titles: 'question'

Is there a reason why that's disallowed?

share|improve this question
You're posting a question - you don't have to say that it's a question because a question is most definitely a question. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Nov 30 '11 at 17:48
@BoltClock'saUnicorn hehe just saw your comment :-P – amanaP lanaC A nalP A naM A Nov 30 '11 at 17:49
Is the disallowment of words 'smart'? Meaning if the word 'question' actually has some importance like 'Output of X for System Y Contains A Question Mark' is it going to be allowed? Obviously, if you say 'My question is...' or 'Question: ' it should not be allowed but what if the word is actually important to the question? – docmanhattan Nov 30 '11 at 18:41
@docmanhattan: We can avoid 99% of a type of annoying user behavior by hindering .0001% of questions??? I'm all for that. – Won't Nov 30 '11 at 18:56

Answer: Because it would be redundant and pointless.

share|improve this answer
I have a comment – phwd Nov 30 '11 at 17:56
This is my reply to your comment. – Won't Nov 30 '11 at 17:58
comment: +1 to this answer. – amanaP lanaC A nalP A naM A Nov 30 '11 at 18:03
One can't conclude that in general. SO deals with a vast variety of programming languages and their libraries and stuff. Often one needs to quote the name of a function, module, package, or some such exactly. What if I indeed had a question about, say, some Question module? – Prateek Nov 30 '11 at 18:53
@prateek: That's why we have tags. – Won't Nov 30 '11 at 18:55
Is the idea to add a 'Question' tag to the post? If so perhaps the initial message could state that? – larryq Nov 30 '11 at 19:02
To get around rules about a specific word being banned in questions even if it is perfectly relevant? What if, say, it referred to some Data.Question.Evaluation foobar, which is far too specific to put in a tag? In any case, I don't think we can safely conclude that one will never need the word question in any reasonable question. – Prateek Nov 30 '11 at 19:05
@larryq: If someone was foolish enough to create some framework or tool called "Question" (or maybe they hate people searching for their product?) then there would exist a "Question" tag which could be applied to the ... question. We don't need a tag stating that a question was a question because we already know the question was a question, with out question. – Won't Nov 30 '11 at 20:45
That's funny, but prateek's comment has merit I think. Do we really want a tag for question, instead of letting someone enter it on the subject bar? The tone given when asking 'Question about X' is a little cooler than 'Why does X do <something>', it sounds less urgent and hyperventilating. Also, if it's obvious that a question is being asked why not ban question marks as well? – larryq Nov 30 '11 at 21:11
@larryq: Uh, no, we don't want the word "question" in the title. Can you think of some utterly never-going-to-happen situation where it will be a problem? Why, of course. But it will never -- ever -- happen. And, if it does, create that namespace tag (we have namespace-based tags!) or flag for mod attention. Honestly, I'd rather help 100 people a month who need "question" in the title than see one more person poop out a "Question about Foo" - type title. – Won't Nov 30 '11 at 21:18
@RobZ: You can also call it a conditional operator, a ternary operator even a "? operator". Again, not an issue. – Won't Jan 11 '12 at 13:33
@RobZ: Look, if I find a pile of nits that need picking, I'll call on you. I expect this hypothetical student to suffer for the greater good. In fact, I will enjoy his suffering. It makes me warm and tingly inside. – Won't Jan 11 '12 at 13:41
@RobZ: You need to have a little sense of humor on meta. The point I was trying to make humorous (and obviously failed) was that, for any rule, you can find corner cases where the rule does more harm than good. The danger is concentrating on that (or those) corner cases to the point where you weigh them disproportionately. Some hypothetical student who just can't figure out how to ask a question about the ternary operator doesn't outweigh thousands of posts whose titles consist of little more than "Question about technology X". – Won't Jan 11 '12 at 13:50

We're trying to encourage the growth of little mini blog posts, instead of the random, forum-like activity that is so common on the Internet.

Many rules on the Stack that otherwise seem nit-picky serve to further that goal. Disallowing signatures and taglines, for example.

Anytime you come across one of these rules that seems to be random and pointless, ask yourself, "Would this be appropriate for a blog post?"

share|improve this answer
Thank you Robert. Is there a posting on the meta site discussing this further? – larryq Nov 30 '11 at 18:52
You mean the encouragement of quality? It's just a general principle. In fact, it's the fundamental principle on which Stack Overflow was founded. It's asking the question, "Will this make the Internet a better place?" – Robert Harvey Nov 30 '11 at 19:08
I meant the banning of specific words, which ones and why. We're all for encouraging quality but I think (for instance) prateek raises some interesting points. – larryq Nov 30 '11 at 19:22
This is a great point. I was just describing what we do -- at least, what we're trying to encourage people to do here -- as a million tiny blog posts to John Siracusa yesterday. – Jeff Atwood Jan 11 '12 at 18:08

By definition a Question is a QUESTION

There is no read to reiterate that.

You might want to take a look at this semi-related question: "Subjective" heuristics a bit off?

share|improve this answer
True, but questions about the "question mark operator" seem to show up quite a bit and "What does ?? mean?" is a bit harder to search. – rjzii Jan 11 '12 at 13:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .