Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Google was recently issued a patent for Delegating authority to evaluate content. It seems to mainly focus on delegation of authority to others.

Essentially we're delegated varied levels of authority based on our points, but some are delegated special community mod privileges.

I know most of these things don't get solved/understood/worked out until they go to court, but does anyone who's more patent/legaleese savy have any insight?

share|improve this question
The description is so generic that could describe any rating system where who rates the content has different privileges, or roles. – kiamlaluno Nov 30 '11 at 20:09
If challenged I'm sure this would fall, it's the most generic patent I've ever seen. It's just a (very broad/basic/well-known) application of divide and conquer. – Matthew Read Nov 30 '11 at 20:11
I assumed it was probably a "War Chest" type patent to go after companies that piss them off or compete with their revenue sources, I was mainly curious as to how much of an eye we might need to keep on this one. – Aren B Nov 30 '11 at 20:18

The patent was filed in 2010, after SO came into existence, and SO's method for rating posts hasn't changed since then. Therefore the patent cannot affect SO as it is (if SO was covered by one of the claims then it would constitute prior art and invalidate that claim).

It's possible that some of the claims (which I haven't read too closely) might affect Stack Exchange's plans with anonymous feedback. But those claims look awfully generic; if this patent is at all accepted, the broadest claims are not likely to survive.

share|improve this answer
What are Stack Exchange's plans with anonymous feedback? – Herbert Dec 1 '11 at 21:18

It's not the same thing.

Read the last 5 paragraphs for an example of how their model works. I really don't think that's something that could reliably be put into practice.

And certainly not without a tremendous amount of work involved by the various "authorities" it mentions. SO shouldn't have anything to worry about.

share|improve this answer
I got to the third last paragraph and went cross-eyed, but I'll take your word for it. This stuff is harder to follow than PERL sans whitespace. – Aren B Nov 30 '11 at 20:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .