What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 149 Stack Exchange communities.

The tag looks like it's being used both for HTML <p> paragraph elements and for questions about P-NP.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/p

It looks like the former (<p>) occupies the majority of its use.

Before I go make changes, I just want to get the support or anti-support of the community.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Dronehinge, nicael, Aziz Shaikh, gnat, doppelgreener Dec 30 '14 at 9:51

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Dronehinge, nicael, Aziz Shaikh, gnat, doppelgreener
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2 Answers 2

It should be burned. P-NP problem questions should be retagged and the rest should be killed.

Encouraging tags for each HTML-Tag is a bad idea, otherwise I propose that the following tags also represent HTML-Tags:

share|improve this answer
2  
I agree with this. Might not hurt to have a different meta question to address the issue as a whole? That way we can reference it later, and it'll be easier to search for than this question. –  Rob Hruska Dec 7 '11 at 14:33
    
@RobHruska: Well, can't hurt, yes. –  Time Traveling Bobby Dec 7 '11 at 14:35
    
Is burnination too permanent? What if we just discourage its use - what happens when the Next Awesome Language named "p" comes along? That's probably too special of a case to worry about. If it happens, someone will post here that they can't add the [p] tag and it'll get unburninated and used-appropriately. –  Rob Hruska Dec 7 '11 at 15:18
    
If you want to create the other question, feel free to; otherwise let me know and I'll write it up. Here's some more fuel for it: div, table. It might be a little difficult to generalize the question. The best answer will probably be one that says each tag needs to be looked at case-by-case. –  Rob Hruska Dec 7 '11 at 15:25
    
@RobHruska: You can call it a big clean-up for those (html) tags (have a look at the clan-up tag for inspirations). Also, feel free to write it, I won't have the time today to do that anyway. –  Time Traveling Bobby Dec 7 '11 at 15:27
    
I may not have time today either. Maybe later this evening. –  Rob Hruska Dec 7 '11 at 15:45

I recommend we:

  • Update 's wiki to say it should be used for <p>
  • Re-tag the P-NP-related uses with something else. Perhaps ?
share|improve this answer
5  
Disagree. A tag for a HTML element is stupid. –  Joe Dec 7 '11 at 14:54
2  
I'm not sure that can be made as a blanket statement. [canvas] might be a decent tag. I agree for [p], though. –  Rob Hruska Dec 7 '11 at 14:59

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .