Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I've read this, so I understand that every time I select "invalid flag" the original flag will become disputed, and will be listed as such in my flagging summary. But why do most of these flags show up in my flagging summary like this:

invalid flag – 17 hours ago disputed

but one or two show up like this

invalid flag – 19 hours ago disputed - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

Is there a difference? Does the latter mean that an actual moderator took the time to look at the original flag, and also selected invalid, while the former indicates that no moderator ever looked at it?

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The latter message only shows up when a moderator clicks the radio button in a "dismiss flags" dialog that is captioned "A moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it."

I assume your former example came from the /tools/flagged page, where reviewers can "disagree" with a flag. Flags that already have a "disagree" on them can be dismissed by a moderator without providing additional explanation.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .