Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

SO and most SE sites that are currently flourishing deal with open communities discussing technologies and subjects that are, for the most part, public domain or at least open for discussion.

Other communities are not so fortunate.

Take Healthcare IT for example, a new site still in public beta that is struggling somewhat.

Firstly I invite you to read another post I made to explain the specific challenges facing a site on Healthcare IT .

And secondly take a look at the proposal, still very much in it's infancy to try to tackle the difficult task of getting participation of experts that are behind a NDA wall of some sort.

Now the idea of corporate accounts or group accounts has been discussed here before in many angles. And I do agree with some of the arguments that were given stating they do not have a place. SE is not a social networking site and to emulate linked-in or viadeo would just dilute the purpose of SE. I don't think that groups should be first class citizen as this opens the door to many abuses.

Nonetheless I still believe there is room for allowing some sort grouping strategy to make it easier for users that are walled in to still participate to the community. I do not have yet the appropriate recipe or formulas fort his concept but I think it warrants another visit.

I also believe in the meritocracy that reputation system creates. This concept should be extended to groups in some way through the actions of their members during their active membership.

I think the solution lies along the lines of some extra statistics on individual accounts and some extra functionality for "administrators" of this group to allow them some targeted overview on the actions of the members.

Again I do not have the complete final solution just the idea but I know that we should find a way to invite corporate entities to participate in the community. I am certain that we can figure ways to make this participation beneficial for both SE and the group.

Note that I speak here of corporate but carefully crafted solution would be generic where corporate entities is just an aspect of it.

share|improve this question
Healthcare IT is actually in public beta right now. It is somewhat struggling though. – Shog9 Dec 8 '11 at 3:30
You might want to ask the MathOverflow folks this question. They have this down to a science. – Robert Harvey Dec 8 '11 at 3:53
@Shog9 ha yes! indeed. I guess I need more coffee! I will correct the question, thanks for that. – Newtopian Dec 8 '11 at 3:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .