Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Questions with nefarious intent?

Every so often, we get a question like this on SO:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8452855/how-can-i-hide-my-program-from-task-manager

I realize this will probably be voted-to-close by the time you read this, probably as off-topic or "not a real question."

But is it? I realize it's unpalatable -- there's usually not a good reason to do what the OP is asking. But "legitimate" software does this too (think: security software, anti-virus, etc.) So should it be closed? It is a programming question, and it's a slippery slope to get into the judgement of intentions behind the question. (Ok, in this case, he says it's for a keylogger, but what if he said it was for "parental control" software?)

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by random Dec 9 '11 at 23:37

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

4  
You're seeing a first attempt or code that others aren't/can't see? – random Dec 9 '11 at 23:20
5  
Why did you choose such a crap quality question and frame it like it was closed on the basis of ethics? – random Dec 9 '11 at 23:31
2  
Interesting to contrast it with stackoverflow.com/questions/8434976/… from yesterday (and also closed). Any mods want to look at those profiles? – dmckee Dec 9 '11 at 23:44
4  
It's also a duplicate question many times over, but I really can't bring myself to help a keylogger-writer who can't be bothered to search. – Shog9 Dec 10 '11 at 0:59

It's just not a good question - it shows no effort at all. A google will give you the answer instantly.

Additionally - you should include the version of operating system etc., as well as information around what the program is (does it run as a DLL or an exe etc)

share|improve this answer

Ignoring the fact that it's an excessively basic question, and focusing only on the ethics -

Strictly speaking, it should not be closed or downvoted because it mentions a keylogger. It's a perfectly valid question that could apply to any kind of program, including legit ones.

However, there is a strong sentiment against assisting with the writing of malware. Questions openly discussing malware (or appearing to do so) will be received badly.

Rewording the question will often help - for better (if it's an innocent purpose) or worse (if the OP is really writing malware).

share|improve this answer
    
I'd bet that if he hadn't mentioned anything about why he needed it, it'd get closed anyway for the same reason. – Joe Dec 9 '11 at 23:22
    
@Joe yeah, true - but rightly so, as I bet the answer can be Googled within a minute. Didn't think of that – Pëkka Dec 9 '11 at 23:23
    
There's lots of answers here you could probably just Google. I guess I don't find the current close reasons to include ethical/moral objection, and I wonder if that's an area we should be delving into at all... – Joe Dec 9 '11 at 23:28
    
@Joe People dislike questions they deem unethical, I don't think there is much that can (nor should) be done about that. – Pëkka Dec 9 '11 at 23:30
    
Dislike is fine -- vote it down, don't answer. But I'm specifically asking about close votes: why is this question voted to close? (Rory provides some good details below, but I think that's a nitpick -- if he provided that info, I don't think the result would be any different.) – Joe Dec 9 '11 at 23:31
1  
@Joe I think it wasn't closed because of the ethics, but because it was a bad question. – Pëkka Dec 9 '11 at 23:37

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .