Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

It seems like a bit of a backtrack to limit users to only a certain number of moderation flags in the day. I understand why the limit is in place, so people can't "spam" moderators with useless flags (is this even the reason?). But those of us who use them appropriately should be able to continue flagging things that we find to be inappropriate. I've used all of my flags for the day, at least the normal, non-spam-offensive flags. So now if I see something which is not an answer, etc I am unable to flag anything further until the magical reset point at midnight UTC.

It would be nice if there was some way for helpful flaggers to get additional flag votes during the consecutive day if their flags continue to prove helpful to moderators. I think a good implementation would be to still allow the same limit and forbid them from continuing to flag until a majority of those flags have already been reviewed. If the user maintains a helpful record throughout the day, they should continue to receive 3 or 5 more flag votes as they continue running out so they can keep flagging things here and there and remain helpful. Once the user gets 2 or 3 declined flags for the day, they will cease to receive additional flag votes for the day and any remaining bonus flag votes they had should be revoked.

If this can't be implemented, could someone explain why it shouldn't and/or why the limit for number of moderation flags per day should remain limited as such?

share|improve this question
This seems sensible. The only thing that I can think of against it is that mods are now encouraged to dismiss nearly every flag as "helpful", meaning there's no way to discriminate between "very helpful" and "marginally helpful" flagger. – Josh Caswell Dec 10 '11 at 7:28
@Problem: Perhaps what is really needed is another option. Maybe moderators should be able to mark as declined, dismissed, or helpful, in which a dismissed flag will have no effect whatsoever on the user's flag weight of daily flag record. – animuson Dec 10 '11 at 7:32
I'd love to have the neutral option to dismiss too. I feel dirty dismissing some flags as helpful when in fact they aren't, and I can't think of compelling reasons to decline them instead. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Dec 10 '11 at 7:37
I think comment flags already work like this. Some days I've got through 100+ – martin clayton Dec 10 '11 at 11:07
Related:… – Jason Plank Dec 10 '11 at 17:28
How about a user gets back every approved flag and can cast it again immediately? – John Dec 10 '11 at 19:01
In the worst case that a user goes malicious, the user can spam the queue with nearly 100 flags (normal flags, spam/offensive flag, comment flag). Increasing the number of flags per day may make the problem above worse, but giving user back a flag for every (n) helpful flag doesn't change the number of unreviewed flags of the user at any time. – nhahtdh Jul 25 '12 at 9:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .