What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 127 Stack Exchange communities.

I was confused when I saw this Question with [Solved] in its title where I couldn't find a solution: My Propertgrid Repeats on every controls click present on to the form.

Then I found out that the "[Solved]" part was put there by someone else through editing like these:

I was feeling that this was not how it's supposed to be done and searched meta to find, that it is indeed discouraged to do so:

But on the other hand, the user who did the edits has a whole lot of reputation so I might me missing something here. So what's the correct thing to do? Should those edits be reverted?

share|improve this question
14  
High rep != great editor every time. –  razlebe Dec 15 '11 at 13:55
2  
Here's another one: stackoverflow.com/questions/8519597/… –  Shane Wealti Dec 15 '11 at 14:13
2  
Sigh, just trying to avoid other SO contributors waste time on a resolved question like I did when I discovered the "I solved it!" comment from the OP. Okay, okay, not appreciated, I'll stop it. –  Uphill Luge Dec 15 '11 at 14:25
1  
Even if the OP got his problem solved there's no time wasted in providing a good answer for someone else having the same problem since they will definitely miss the "I solved it" buried somewhere in the comments. –  noah1989 Dec 15 '11 at 14:30
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 49 down vote accepted

You're right, putting "[SOLVED]" in the title is not the right thing to do.

If the OP made the edit then leave a comment explaining the correct behaviour - i.e. post the solution as an answer.

If someone else made the edit then roll back the edit and leave a comment addressed at the editor explaining the right thing to do.

In either case if the solution hasn't been posted as a separate answer after (say) 24 hours then there's nothing to stop you posting it yourself. You might want to make the answer Community Wiki so there can be no accusations of "stealing" other people's reputation.

In this case it's a 200K+ user who made the edit - they should know better. I've rolled back the edit.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks clearing this up for me :) –  noah1989 Dec 15 '11 at 13:41
7  
I find it extremely strange and disturbing that it was 200k+ user doing that...and that he's doing it regularly! –  Time Traveling Bobby Dec 15 '11 at 14:20
2  
@Bobby - as do we all. We are investigating. –  ChrisF Dec 15 '11 at 14:21
9  
Just noting that such edits are highly uncharacteristic of said 200k user, and we're currently looking into it. –  Tim Post Dec 15 '11 at 14:33
add comment

No, adding "[SOLVED]", or any variation thereof, to a question title is forbidden (if it isn't strictly, through any documented consensus, then it should be ...and punishable by, ...something dire.)

There is absolutely no need to do this anyway, it treads on the system: it's almost like adding some form of custom tag, which isn't quite a tag, just mess; whether an answer has been accepted or not is the decider - whether the OP went off and solved it elsewhere, by themselves, is irrelevant.

share|improve this answer
22  
This is a fine answer. I think we can mark this question [SOLVED] now! –  Pëkka Dec 15 '11 at 13:43
3  
@TheP.G.RepMiningCo.: You beat me to it by 20 seconds... –  Dennis Dec 15 '11 at 13:44
4  
The tile of this question already contains "[Solved]" ;-) –  noah1989 Dec 16 '11 at 8:43
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .