What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

On my way towards the Copy Editor badge I've been fixing quite a lot of typos recently. Some of them are rather obvious, i.e. desing to design and paramter to parameter.

It has occured to me that an easy way of fixing a number of typos exactly in the same way would be useful. For example, I could ask the site to replace all desing by design, at least, in question titles; get a list of results (proposed changes); and manually accept each of them with a "Confirm change" button.

This would accelerate a process that would be dangerous if done in a totally automated way, but that with an easy manual confirmation step, would add value to the site in a fast way.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 13 down vote accepted

We don't want edits to be a single typo like that, and we really don't want it make it so easy to fix a single typo without scouring the post to see what else needs fixing first. If you really want to fix all instances of a typo, search for it. But look through the post and find other things to correct while you're there.

share|improve this answer
3  
Indeed. Some typos are often an indicator that there are other items that could be cleaned up. –  jadarnel27 Dec 15 '11 at 21:31
1  
I find that a post that has one less typo represents an improvement, even if there were other typos. –  Tshepang Jun 8 at 19:38
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .