Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

In my opinion it's getting harder to distinguish who is/was talking to whom lately.

It can be pretty confusing (and it's not really comfortable) to follow a thread of Alice - known as Bob until yesterday - answering to a comment/post originated by Fred, who has changed his/her name to Dharma four weeks ago, created and deleted a comment under that name, and changed the name again to Sally the day before yesterday and commenting again.

This is just a hypothetical example, but you know what I mean.

Can I find out the renaming history of a user in a post's context (or in general)?

How am I supposed to easily follow threads with massive name changes (and/or comment deletions)?

share|improve this question
Yeah, sometimes I really feel kinda welbog'ed^^ – Jürgen Thelen Dec 17 '11 at 21:34
It'd be nice if the comment contraption would update the names to match the current names. :) – sarnold Dec 18 '11 at 1:42

Stack Overflow is not a forum. Comments are generally not intended to be... necessary information. Therefore, exactly who said what to whom is not considered important information. The primary purpose of the @-stuff is to be able to notify someone that you're responding to them, so that they can get the information you're trying to give them. That someone can come along a few weeks later and get something from it is more or less unimportant.

share|improve this answer
If comments don't serve any historical/traceable purpose, why are they still there, even after months of inactivity? I can't believe, that the SE team would keep tons of "clutter" for no reason. MSO is a place with much discussion in the comments. Even on SO, I more often than not need the comments to understand how a post has evolved from question to solution. And to know who wrote what, helps me to build mental pictures of people I don't know in real life, but only in virtuality. – Jürgen Thelen Dec 18 '11 at 10:47
@JürgenThelen: There's a difference between "useless" and "not necessary". – Nicol Bolas Dec 18 '11 at 17:09
yes, I'm aware of this difference^^. But if it's really "more or less unimportant, if someone can still get something from it a few weeks later", then you and me may just have different opinions about what the point of SE sites is. For me it's to build free, wiki-style knowledge bases, for current and for already solved problems. If it's really only thought to handle current/unsolved problems (kind of hotline), I completely misunderstood that point. – Jürgen Thelen Dec 18 '11 at 22:08
@JürgenThelen: Except that you can't edit comments. So you can't build "wiki-style knowledge bases" on comments. What matters on SE sites are questions and answers. Everything else is not the point. – Nicol Bolas Dec 19 '11 at 1:06
Hm, I wasn't talking about editing comments, but using comments to track how a post evolved for current and already solved problems. I thought that emphasis on and was clear. Otoh I'm not a native speaker, so maybe my phrasing just sucks. Nevermind, your pov seems to be, that comments on posts older than a few weeks don't necessarily need to be understood anymore; as long as there is a question and answers, everything's fine. So we simply disagree. I'm ok with that. – Jürgen Thelen Dec 19 '11 at 1:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .