What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

If an answer is grey after being downvoted so many times, why is it still allowed up top if it is selected answer.

To me that just speaks volumes of the ability of the OP to select a useful answer. Plus it just makes me scroll down more often.

Can we forgo the special position of a selected answer, if it is greyed?

Example: http://stackoverflow.com/a/8578460/491837

My suggested solution is if a selected answer is grey, the top voted answer is placed above selected answer.

Another solution is to introduce a new sort option called standard. Standard is by votes with the selected answer at top. Sort by votes, is sort by votes, selected status has no priority.

Third solution. User option, hide greyed answers.

share|improve this question
    
stackoverflow.com/a/8578460/809387 –  Griwes Dec 20 '11 at 17:10
    
Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/50432/… –  Jason Plank Dec 20 '11 at 17:39
2  
As a point of reference, just under 3000 questions have accepted, negatively voted answers, or about 0.12% of all questions. The vast majority of those have only one or two downvotes. –  Bill the Lizard Dec 20 '11 at 18:17
1  
I'm sure I've only fallen through a floor once or twice playing any game ever. However, statistically small of a chance, it was notable enough to put 3 or 4 people on the problem for a week. Falling through a floor is a really bad experience for people. And people appreciate by experience, not statistics. –  Lee Louviere Dec 20 '11 at 18:55
    
@Xaade The difference is that you're not stuck when a bad answer is accepted. Just scroll down to see the top voted answer. –  Bill the Lizard Dec 20 '11 at 19:12
    
@Bill Yeah, that's called load previous save. :P Ok, I get the point. I just don't agree with it. –  Lee Louviere Dec 20 '11 at 23:37

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

If the problem is that such an answer shouldn't have been accepted in the first place, maybe another (complimentary?) idea would be to warn users if they try to accept an answer with a negative score.

This answer has a negative score, meaning the community believes it to be unhelpful. Are you sure you want to accept it?

In cases like your example where the score is really low, the answer would likely have a negative score before the 15 minutes needed to accept an answer comes up. In cases where the score is more like -1, it could be dubious as to whether it's a crap answer (could be a sour voter and might get +4 later or something), but it'd still be useful in most cases.

share|improve this answer
1  
In this case, answer was selected before downvotes were applied. –  Lee Louviere Dec 20 '11 at 17:38
2  
I think something of a community vote unselect would be nice. Similar to a community vote close. –  Lee Louviere Dec 20 '11 at 17:39
1  
@Xaade, that has been discussed many times before, and rejected. –  Michael Petrotta Dec 20 '11 at 17:48

It's simply because it has -9 votes. While the OP may have marked that this is what solved their problem, 11 people in the community (it has 2 upvotes) said this was the wrong solution and it is greyed out because the community says you should avoid doing it this way, and try a method that is available below that answer. Just because something is accepted doesn't necessarily mean it is right. I didn't read the question or know what it's talking about, but if I ever came across the question looking for this information, I would trust that the greyed answer should be ignored and I'd just go down to the answer with a score of 13 instead.

I've answered several questions (example) where the OP has gone with the undesirable or easy solution rather than the more logical solution. Some people are just stubborn. Oh well, nothing we can do about that.

share|improve this answer
    
There is something we can do. Move the selected question down in the order. I sorted by votes, not by selected answer. I want the answer with the most votes at the top. –  Lee Louviere Dec 20 '11 at 17:44
    
@Xaade: I don't think this issue is prevalent enough to need to change the sorting order. The answer is already greyed out. –  animuson Dec 20 '11 at 17:47
3  
Then hide greyed answers option please. Did you look at the example. The selected answer is easily two pages long. –  Lee Louviere Dec 20 '11 at 17:48
    
It's only one page long for me. You can hide it yourself in Firefox. Download AdBlock Plus with the Element Hiding Helper and add a rule: stackoverflow.com##.downvoted-answer and any answers which are greyed out will be hidden. I'm sure other browsers have alternate ways of doing a similar thing. –  animuson Dec 20 '11 at 17:54
2  
So, your answer is, since you can override the functionality of a website, there's no need to ever add new features to any website? –  Lee Louviere Dec 20 '11 at 17:57
    
No, my answer is that this rarely ever happens, so I don't see the dev team implementing anything. That's just a workaround. –  animuson Dec 20 '11 at 17:58
2  
Grey is to de-emphasize. Hiding is another step in de-emphasizing. Seems a logical result. Why have a couple of page long answer fill up any space at all if the point is to say, ignore this unless you want to read it. We collapse comments, why can't we collapse answers. –  Lee Louviere Dec 20 '11 at 18:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .