What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

In the sites FAQ it states

"Please don’t use signatures or taglines in your posts, or they will be removed."

Though these edits are sometimes rejected for being too minor. If edits are going to be rejected for this reason, should the above statement be included in the FAQ?

share|improve this question
6  
Note that suggested edits aren't the only way a post may be edited. –  Michael Petrotta Dec 20 '11 at 22:35
1  
You could spend the rest of your life editing out signatures and taglines. –  user7116 Dec 21 '11 at 2:48

2 Answers 2

Though these edits are sometimes rejected for being too minor.

If you wanna make the most of editing on Stack Exchange, you should read In Defense of Editing:

If you are going to edit a post, make sure you’re substantively improving it. Avoid making isolated, trivial edits, as they are the source of much friction. For example, don’t bother changing “its” to “it’s” unless you have several other edits to make in the same post. There has to be a legitimate case that your edit made multiple changes transforming the post from good to great — or at least substantively improving it.

...

To be very specific, I would discourage editing a post solely to remove salutations like “hi” and “thanks”. That’s just adding an unnecessary edit on top of an unnecessary set of salutations. I completely agree that salutations add little to a question or answer, but if you’re going to take the time to go in and remove salutations, fix the whole post while you’re at it! If there’s nothing else to edit, then don’t bother.

These guidelines are good ones to follow whenever you're editing, regardless of whether you need someone to approve the results or not. If you're stepping in to improve the post, do everything in your power to accomplish that goal - don't make one little change and then call it a day.

Do we discourage signatures? Sure. Is the presence of a sig reason enough to edit an otherwise perfectly-good post? Probably not. Make your edits count for something.

share|improve this answer
    
And that's me told lol Thanks for a good answer –  Darren Burgess Dec 20 '11 at 22:58

Suggested edits that fix just a small part of what should be fixed are sometimes rejected. The reason is that, if you are going to edit a post, you should edit as much as you can to make the post more understandable, without changing its meaning. Imagine the situation we would have, if the same post is edited by different users who, one after the other:

  • edit the post to remove signatures, or taglines
  • edit the post to change the spelling of the first person singular
  • edit the post to correct the punctuation
  • edit the post to add a link to a page with relevant information
share|improve this answer
5  
It's not widely known that editing by 5 different people or 12 edits, will cause the question to become Community Wiki - so it's important to filter minor edits IMO. Sometimes it's even better to notify one of the editors and ask him to edit again. –  Shadow Wizard Dec 21 '11 at 7:58
    
That's correct, and a good reason for not having more than one user doing the editing, when the same could be done from a single user. –  kiamlaluno Dec 21 '11 at 21:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .