Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Users can only upvote five questions per proposal on Area 51, as is well known. It is probably less well known that you don't have to have followed a proposal to upvote or even propose questions.

What I didn't know until I tested it today is that there does not seem to be any limit in the number of downvotes a user may inflict on a proposal, even one they never committed to. I just successfully made (and then reversed) seven downvotes on questions on a proposal I am not following.

Bulk downvoting would probably be picked up by the abuse detectors but it does seem like a loophole that would allow users to throw sand in the wheels of a rival proposal to the o e they favor.

EDIT Please note that I am not referring to the per-day voting limits. The issue is that a user can only upvote five questions on a particular proposal, but can downvote all the the questions on that proposal. In the unlikely event there were more than 30 questions on a proposal, you could still downvote them all over several days. But you could only upvote five of them. This seems asymmetric.

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by ChrisF, Pops, kiamlaluno, Kevin Vermeer, Lorem Ipsum Jan 28 '12 at 22:32

Questions on Meta Stack Exchange are expected to relate to the software that powers the Stack Exchange network within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This should probably be discussed on; Meta Stack Overflow is not anymore reported to be the meta for Area 51. – kiamlaluno Jan 3 '12 at 12:58
throw sand in the wheels of a rival proposal to the one they favor - This is an interesting statement. There shouldn't be this kind of division on Area51. Any examples? – Kevin Vermeer Jan 3 '12 at 17:13
@KevinVermeer none I could think of. Maybe I just am over-active in thinking about hypothetical and potentials. – Verbeia Jan 3 '12 at 20:59
@kiamlaluno ok I will ask it there. I just didn't see many questions about the mechanics of the code as opposed to the proposals themselves. – Verbeia Jan 3 '12 at 21:03
Questions that are not about the proposals should be tagged "area51-meta"; that is the tag used for questions about how Area 51 works, or feature requests that would change the code used on Area 51. – kiamlaluno Jan 3 '12 at 21:26
@kiamlaluno ok I have asked it over there. I hope I get to keep the Convention badge this question got me :-) – Verbeia Jan 3 '12 at 21:29

Browse other questions tagged .