Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

protected by XXX

This question is protected to prevent "thanks!", "me too!", or spam answers by new users. To answer it, you must have earned more than 10 reputation on this site.

Can this text be changed to at least (non-strict inequality)? As far as I know this is the case.

share|improve this question
It used to be 15. I guess you can get one upvote and accept an answer to one of your questions now, as opposed to getting one upvote on a question and one upvote on an answer. I'd rather see two positive actions instead of just one. – Robert Harvey Jan 3 '12 at 16:03
As a non-native English speaker, I feel a little bit lost here...what exactly is the difference here? It's two ways to say the same thing, but what renders it different here? Politeness? – Time Traveling Bobby Jan 3 '12 at 16:07
@Bobby "at least 10" includes 10; "more than 10" means a minimum of 11 – Michael Mrozek Jan 3 '12 at 16:11
Bobby: If you have exactly 10 reputation, then you have at least 10, but not more than 10 (i.e. >=10 but not >10). I know the difference is small and useless as most people gain quickly reputation, but as a mathematician/programmer I have OCD about such details. Personally I think the requirement could be bit higher, say 30. – sdcvvc Jan 3 '12 at 16:11
@Bobby: "Non-strict equality" means that the user would need just 10 rep. It's probably a moot point anyway, since every new user gets 1 rep free, and one upvote on an answer gives them 11 rep. So all we're talking about here is pedantry about the wording. – Robert Harvey Jan 3 '12 at 16:12
@sdcvvc: I'd actually place it as high as the required comment-everywhere rep. – Mat Jan 3 '12 at 16:16
Even though it's wrong I'll miss the old wording. Farewell, more than. – Kalamane Jan 25 '12 at 17:53
up vote 5 down vote accepted

This text will be updated after our next deploy later today.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .