Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

While reviewing I occasionally stumble upon "answers" like this one or this pair of posts. Both cases consist of a question that has been posted as an answer and then has been subsequently answered, although in the second case the thread was practically hijacked by a single user...

Most often, the question is related to another answer and everything can be demoted to a bunch of comments. In some cases, though, this would not really make sense. I normally flag these as "Not an answer", but in some cases I have felt that the content was worth preserving in some form.

  • It seems to me that the answer in the first case took some effort. Is there a way to preserve it, while maintaining the proper Q&A format?

    Alternatively, would it make sense for a reviewer to let posts like this be, in order to preserve the content? I have routinely let some far more useless posts be, simply because they actually were answers, even if it was barely so.

    Is there a fine line somewhere, or should reviewers follow a strict "No questions as answers" and flag away, even for years-old threads?

  • In cases like the second one, should I flag both the question-as-answer and the answering post? The answering post would probably not make much sense after the question has been deleted...

share|improve this question
1  
up vote 4 down vote accepted

... or should reviewers follow a strict "No questions as answers" and flag away, even for years-old threads?

Yes. Fortunately, and especially, since it has already been re-asked as a question. Moderators can't move an answer from one question to another, however, so I have left a comment on the question-as-answer asking Thomas if he'd like to do it so I can remove the bad post.

In cases like the second one, should I flag both the question-as-answer and the answering post?

If the answering post answers the question-as-answer, and not the original question, then flag that along with the question-as-answer.

share|improve this answer
    
I've flagged posts like this before and found out that moderators don't have that power -- does it come up often enough that you would like that power? I've only seen three or four cases myself. – sarnold Jan 6 '12 at 3:07
    
@sarnold: Same here. Personally, I think it'd be nice. I'll have to be really careful with it, though ;) – BoltClock's a Unicorn Jan 6 '12 at 3:11
    
And there's a point of how much janitorial work are we alright putting on our small team of mods -- at some point, a big negative "close" hammer sends a lesson that might not be learned if you guys magically make things right all the time... – sarnold Jan 6 '12 at 3:21
    
Indeed. As in A Theory of Moderation, most mod interventions are meant to be exceptional. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Jan 6 '12 at 3:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .