Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This user has posted 3 posts now that I've seen. Two of which I've answered. They all start out exactly the same, go through major edits and s/he/it moves on to repeat the process.

The suspicious posts:

Destroy timeout for HistoryRecord

wont run, wont switch activities

Android Error "Application not installed"

Sorry, not sure if you can link to specific revisions other than source but if you look at those three posts, you'll see the progression that takes place.

What's happening here? Is this not human?

share|improve this question
I don't think robots are capable of answering those comments like that. – Mysticial Jan 10 '12 at 4:50
Seriously, then what could be happening? It's bizarre! – TryTryAgain Jan 10 '12 at 4:52
"It didn't work." – bobobobo Jan 10 '12 at 5:42
Just read this: from now on, I will only flag a post rather than writing up on Meta. – TryTryAgain Jan 10 '12 at 6:08
don't think it's a robot, just someone who don't know how to use the system. – Shadow Wizard Jan 10 '12 at 10:24
No that's not robot, – ali youhannaei Jan 10 '12 at 16:54
"Application not installed" in Android... errr... what I meant to say was that no, that's definitely a human being. Case closed. – Patrick87 Jan 11 '12 at 21:17
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The questions are all different aside from the posting style and the user is responding to comments intelligently, so this looks to me more like the user's not learning from the edits than anything else.

Update: Nevermind; looking at first revisions of each post, it does seem like something odd's going on. I'll take care of it from here. Thanks for the lead!

P.S. You can link to a revision like this. You can either create the URL manually (cause everyone loves doing that, right?) or by using the little chain icon beside the revision:

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
But the first version of the posts are all completely identical. Doesn't that raise some suspicion? – TryTryAgain Jan 10 '12 at 4:55
@TryTryAgain Ergh. You're right. This is kinda weird. I'll handle it. – Adam Lear Jan 10 '12 at 4:58
Hope I don't lose the rep I gained...ha...kidding. Do what you have to do to keep the peace. Thanks :-) Happy to have helped. – TryTryAgain Jan 10 '12 at 4:59
Thanks for the info about how to link revisions, d'uh. If anything can inevitably be publicly known, I'm curious about the outcome if you could post back with any update that would help satisfy a bit of my curiosities. – TryTryAgain Jan 10 '12 at 5:17

Maybe this user likes the layout of the first question and uses copy paste as a reminder. And it is saves because he doesn't rely his connection.

share|improve this answer
I did that with three Star Trek Voyager questions on Scifi that were about the same episode of Voyager. +1 – Kalamane Jan 10 '12 at 16:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .