Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

On this question, the asker initially included a signature. This was later edited out by a high-rep user. Then, the asker edited the signature back in.

The asker's rep is low enough that he/she probably doesn't know that signatures are frowned on (and didn't take the hint when it was edited out).

Possible courses of action in the future:

  1. flag for moderator attention
  2. edit post
  3. edit post + add comment pointing to FAQ
  4. whine on meta (check)


share|improve this question
A somewhat-related discussion that may interest you: Make it harder to roll back a moderator edit – jadarnel27 Jan 16 '12 at 16:04
edit post + add comment pointing to FAQ That. After you posted this, another user removed the signature again, so I went ahead and left the comment myself. – Yannis Jan 16 '12 at 16:06
But, if you notice a repeating behaviour, flag, flag, flag! – Yannis Jan 16 '12 at 16:12
Related.. Good idea not to go for the sarcastic humor angle in your question. – Won't Jan 16 '12 at 18:33
@jadarnel27: lol, didn't see you already pimped my question! – Won't Jan 16 '12 at 18:34
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Please just flag this behaviour for the mods to deal with, there's no point getting into an edit war over it. We can put a lock on the question to prevent it happening again should the OP not get the message.

share|improve this answer
Accepting this answer because it's from a mod. – Matt Fenwick Jan 17 '12 at 13:48

I'd say edit it again, and post a comment. Flagging seems way too much at this point, especially if you can make him realize that there's a rule on the signatures.

share|improve this answer
Agreed. Edit again, post a nice comment, if you're in the mood add some links to Meta discussion on the topic. – Pëkka Jan 16 '12 at 16:33
Certainly do flag if the behavior continues after the situation has been explained to the user however. – Ben Brocka Jan 16 '12 at 16:43

At the end of the day, the person asking a question fundamentally "owns" that question. While I appreciate the rule against un-needed cruft on posts in SE, I have to say that I'm conflicted about making it more difficult to roll back posts when you own a question.

I can't help thinking that there is potential for someone to edit a question in good faith and change the meaning of it - at that point it should not be difficult for the person who asked the question to say "no, that's not what I meant at all" and roll things back. And I don't see how you can tell the intention behind a rollback. (And what if someone makes a substantial edit to a post, mistakenly edits something important to the question and also removes salutations from the post... what should happen then?).

I think we should be looking to explain the rules to new people and give them the chance to do things the right way, not impose them.

share|improve this answer
don't see how you can tell the intention behind a rollback In this case, it's quite obvious from the revision history, the OP didn't rollback, but did another edit just adding his twitter handle. I think your answer is more relevant to this question – Yannis Jan 16 '12 at 16:37
"At the end of the day, the person asking a question fundamentally "owns" that question." Not really.… – Piskvor Jan 16 '12 at 16:59
sigh - you go and try and explain that to a new user, @Piskvor'sSemifiniteMonkeys and do let me know how you get on. They may well not own it in the sense you mean, but they own the truth of the question - if they say "I have a problem with a bit of code doing "X" in my environment" or whatever, while all of us might be more qualified than them to know what ought to happen, they're the expert on what they're actually seeing happen. – RobM Jan 16 '12 at 17:47
@Rob Moir: Fair point. (I didn't realize you meant something else than actually "owning" the question.) – Piskvor Jan 16 '12 at 19:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .