Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

See this answer from lockstep to a question of mine. Should "triad" badges such as Announcer/Booster/Publicist scale in such a way that the number of awarded Bronze# / Silver# is even with Silver# / Golden#?

As in his words:

Right now, 4003 Announcer badges, 186 Booster badges and 93 Publicist badges have been awarded at SO. That is, the ratio of Announcer to Booster is about 1 to 21.5, while for Booster to Publicist it's only (exactly) 1 to 2.

What he says is true. Should a re-calculation of the badge's requirements be made to even it up?

share|improve this question

I don't think so. From the badges page:

Gold Badges are rare. You’ll have to actively work toward these. They’re something of an accomplishment!

On the other end:

Bronze badges are awarded for basic use of Meta Stack Overflow. They are easy to earn.

The current ratios are consistent with these descriptions.

share|improve this answer
7  
I think his point was that silver is just about as hard to earn as the gold badge... – Lorem Ipsum Jan 17 '12 at 0:49
2  
My point is indeed as @yoda says: for example, a good ratio could be from 5:1 upward, so 500 bronze, 100 silver and 20 gold for 5:1; 1000 bronze, 100 silver and 10 gold for 10:1. Such examples look like they would reflect the descriptions better. – Camilo Martin Jan 17 '12 at 16:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .