Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The convention badge has the wording:

10 posts with score of 2 on meta.

Does this mean that to get the badge I need 10 posts with a score of exactly 2 at the same time?

Should the wording be changed to something like:

10 posts with score of 2 or more on meta.

share|improve this question
Looking at disciplined badge's description it clearly says 3 or higher. So I interpret convention badge requires exactly 2. – hims056 Mar 7 '13 at 5:38
@hims056 it says 10 post on meta, can you tell me what is the post stands for? – Sumit Bijvani Mar 7 '13 at 5:40
@SumitBijvani - Post means either question or answer. – hims056 Mar 7 '13 at 5:41
@hims056 okay and score means 2 up votes. I get it thanks – Sumit Bijvani Mar 7 '13 at 5:50
@SumitBijvani - No. Score means upvotes - downvotes. e.g. if you have 2 upvotes and 1 downvote on your post it means your post score is 1 – hims056 Mar 7 '13 at 5:55
@hims056 ohh okay got it – Sumit Bijvani Mar 7 '13 at 5:57
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Does this mean that to get the badge I need 10 posts with a score of exactly 2 at the same time?

It means that when the task checking who gained that badge runs, you need to have 10 posts with a score of at least 2. This is not different from other badges, such as:

All the badges are assigned when a task to check who has the requirements runs. In the description for those badges, you should always add at least before the number they are referring too; for example, the "Strunk & White" badge is given even if, when the task runs, you have edited 84 posts.

I am not sure that adding at least in the description for those badges makes the description clearer, but if it is done for a badge, it should be done for the others.

share|improve this answer
I did take it to have a meaning inline with the other badges. I just think that it should be changed (if only for, as you say, consistency). – George Duckett Jan 17 '12 at 19:25
I disagree, they are different since all of them (except electorate) are like <action><number><times or things>, so even if you read literally you will still get them because at some point you must meet the exactly requirement (as difference of these other two descriptions) – ajax333221 Apr 23 '12 at 21:04
@ajax333221 I don't see any difference, because also "left 10 comments" could be interpreted "left exactly 10 comments." Is there any reason why "with score of 2" should be an exception? – kiamlaluno Apr 24 '12 at 5:50
@kiamlaluno because at some point you MUST have 10 comments, but not necessarily at some point you "must" have exactly score 2 with that num of posts – ajax333221 Apr 24 '12 at 6:18
@ajax333221 What happens if you wrote 9 comments, and you add two more comments before the cron task assigning the badges runs? The Commentator badge is for leaving at least 10 comments, and the Convention badge is for writing 10 posts with at least 2 points; there is no difference with that respect. – kiamlaluno Apr 24 '12 at 6:34

I totally agree with this, the description if read literally it is ambiguous.

I doubt that modifying this particular description will lead to modify others badges description like the ones in the list of @kiamlaluno because they are like:

(badge): (action) (times) (things)
Commentator: Left 10 comments.
Copy Editor: Edited 500 posts.

So for all of them, even if you read them literally, at some point you meet the exact requirement and obtain the badge.

But if you read this literally:

Convention: 10 posts with score of 2 on meta.

Having the badge doesn't necessarily mean you met the exact requirement at some point, as you can get it without having exactly 10 posts with score of 2 (e.g you can have some of them without exactly score of 2, but with higher score than 2 and you will still get it), if they change it to ... score of 2 or more on meta. it leaves no room for ambiguity.

Are there people who really think you have to have exactly 10 posts with score of 2? obviously not, but we should still fix this because people are getting annoyed by this. Not fixing it is like leaving "Satan" instead of "Santa" because everyone knows what the author meant.

share|improve this answer
Apply logic. It would make no sense for it to mean "exactly 2" rather than "at least 2". Since lots of aspects of Stack Exchange expect people to use basic logic and / or common sense, there is no reason to change this just so people don't have to use common sense. – agf Apr 23 '12 at 21:49
@agf so if there is a typo like hte to mean the, should we change it even if with little logic we know what it was meant?. Mostly, these minor edits are not to increase the people to understand the meaning, it is about not to annoy those who care it is wrong – ajax333221 Apr 23 '12 at 22:14
Basically, no, we shouldn't. Typo and pluralization bug reports are not encouraged. – agf Apr 23 '12 at 22:15
Don't need to change it. It's obvious. Where I come from we have a law: "if you drive 25kph over the limit you have your licence confiscated on the spot". Obviously this does not mean if you drive 26kph over you're safe. – Bohemian Jul 29 '13 at 21:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .