Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This hardly makes or breaks an election, but the vote count total for the Stack Overflow election appears to be off. On the election page, it says (emphasis mine):

72,908 voters were eligible, 45,177 visited the site during the election, 17,866 visited the election page, and 5,004 voted

But the election ballot file only contains 4,994 ballots: OpenSTV only reads 4,994 ballots, and there are only 4,994 ballot lines.

Why is this?

Apparently this was silently fixed. Yay! Would still like to understand what happened, though.

share|improve this question
A guess: the ballot data contains no votes that didn't specify a first choice, so perhaps users who had a second or third choice but no first had their votes ignored. I think such a ballot could strictly be considered invalid, even if it might reasonably be interpreted by moving their second/third choices up. – Jeremy Banks Jan 30 '12 at 8:15
@Cleanupcareer-development We were just talking about that in Programmers chat, and found those are counted: of the people who used all three votes, Anna only got 756 first-choice votes; but if you count the people who only used one or two votes, her first choice total goes up to 771, which is what OpenSTV reports in Round 1. – user149432 Jan 30 '12 at 8:17
Another guess: 10 voters went awol at some point. Deleted / merged accounts, temp suspensions. – Yannis Jan 30 '12 at 17:09
The election page apparently changed its mind. – Tim Stone Jan 30 '12 at 18:45
"Why was there a 10 vote discrepancy in the last Stack Overflow election?" One for each of my sock puppets. – Adam Davis Jan 30 '12 at 22:32
up vote 12 down vote accepted

The 10 missing votes were in fact from users who were deleted. I'll make sure this is handled correctly for future elections so that the election download is always correct as of the time the election is completed.

share|improve this answer
I'll make sure we cover up carefully before we let people see the results. </joke> – xmm0 Jan 30 '12 at 22:43
The Bilderberg Group approves. – user149432 Jan 30 '12 at 22:49
Even Stack Overflow accepts votes from the dead?! o_O – Awesome Poodles Jan 30 '12 at 22:51
Given that June 2012 SO election was 10 votes off, and July 2012 SU election 1 vote, in what way was this issue fixed? Please explain. – Daniel Beck Aug 14 '12 at 20:22

Would still like to understand what happened, though.

They fixed the election. The conspiracy is bigger than you realize. You need to meet me at th—


share|improve this answer
I wish I could upvote this more than once. – jadarnel27 Jan 30 '12 at 20:57
I can hear the black helicopters whisking Juan away. I mean, I could hear them if they weren't in stealth mode. – user149432 Jan 30 '12 at 21:03

You must log in to answer this question.